(2008-01-30) — Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards today quit the race for the Democrat presidential nomination, and immediately endorsed Republican frontrunner Sen. John McCain.
“As the presidential field narrows,” Sen. Edwards will reportedly say at an afternoon news conference, “I just didn’t feel there would be room in the race for two white males who favor leniency for illegal aliens, who opposed Bush’s tax cuts for the rich, who fight man-made global warming, who support limits on so-called free speech in political campaigns, who have worked to hinder approval of conservative judicial nominees, and who stand against the Bush administration’s desire to torture terror suspects with waterboarding.”
Mr. Edwards added that, while he’s young enough to run for president 10 more times, the septuagenarian Sen. McCain “may have only five or six more shots at it.”
While Mr. Edwards played down speculation that he might bring balance to the ticket as Sen. McCain’s running mate, he noted that it would be “a once-in-a-lifetime thrill to team up with an actual Vietnam war hero.”
65 responses so far ↓
1 Maggie // Jan 30, 2008 at 11:10 am
Well, a McCain -Edwards ticket would cut printing cost with ” 2 Johns” bumper stickers.
Motto
“Together , we can flush out conservatism,once and for all.
(your turn)
2 Fred Sinclair // Jan 30, 2008 at 11:15 am
It was close, I’ll have to admit, I almost missed the last jab, “Once in a lifetime thrill…….”. Scott, that is brilliant. Right up there with your very best!
Heirborn Ranger
3 mig // Jan 30, 2008 at 11:19 am
Oh, always a bridesmaid.
He’s probably thinking the guy is old, he won’t last a full term and I can get into the Oval office through the back door.
4 da Bunny // Jan 30, 2008 at 11:24 am
In your land of “two Americas” Mr. Edwards, it is obvious that neither one of them wants you.
Great “campaign slogan,” Maggie!!
5 upnorthlurkin // Jan 30, 2008 at 11:31 am
I hadn’t noticed the similarities before! What a hoot!
6 Hawkeye // Jan 30, 2008 at 11:50 am
McCain “may have only five or six more shots at it.â€
Funny Scott
7 edwards drops out | News trend world // Jan 30, 2008 at 12:08 pm
[...] John Edwards Drops Out, Endorses McCain [...]
8 Quote of the Day | On the BorderLine // Jan 30, 2008 at 12:21 pm
[...] John Edwards Drops Out, Endorses McCain This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 30th, 2008 at 11:20 am and is filed under Politics National, RINOS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]
9 EXT // Jan 30, 2008 at 2:12 pm
Unless some miracle saves us from McCain it’s foredoomed that we’re going to have a Liberal president.
With that as a given, might it be time to form up a Conservative Party and run a candidate, at least in a few states?
A certainty not to win but perhaps enough of a showing that what laughingly calls it self “The Republican Party” might wake up and mount a real candidate in 2012 if only to keep Conservatives from splitting the vote and giving Hillary an undisputed 8 years?
10 mindknumbed kid // Jan 30, 2008 at 3:55 pm
This is par for my 2008. Third party candidates will not have enough appeal to take us anywhere. If I have to vote for sHrillary or McPain, I would be very sick, but I would vote against SHrillary, if it is between Obama or McPain I may not show up to do my civic duty. So why not try a Thompson/Hunter ticket? I would vote that way in a heartbeat.
11 JamesonLewis3rd // Jan 30, 2008 at 3:59 pm
Clinton lied, people died.
12 conserve-a-tips // Jan 30, 2008 at 4:03 pm
Lest we forget the past, this may help you remember from 2001.
Romney is the only choice.
Roche Ed: French Bug University
13 gafisher // Jan 30, 2008 at 5:18 pm
JL3 Re#11: In the Clinton lexicon those weren’t really “people.” Donors are “people.” Voters are “people.” Soldiers are “objects of loathing.”
If Hillary is elected, count on lots more non-people deaths.
14 Beerme // Jan 30, 2008 at 6:00 pm
Edward’s luscious locks,
Shunned by both Americas,
Exeunt, stage left…
My Bye-ku for my most favorite hypocrit
15 JamesonLewis3rd // Jan 30, 2008 at 6:07 pm
Just the thought of McCain/Huckabee ’08 causes me, among other things, to experience gut-wrenching spasms of tortuous agony, anguish and anxiety and to barely avoid the mortification of sobbing red-hot tears at a rate of 1 gpm (two eyeballs) for a minimum yield of four gallons.
16 gafisher // Jan 30, 2008 at 6:58 pm
McCain/Anyone would be a disaster!
17 camojack // Jan 30, 2008 at 7:48 pm
Bad hair day…
18 Fred Sinclair // Jan 30, 2008 at 8:05 pm
3:17 PM I posted this it’s now 8:01 PM so I must believe it’s been lost in the ether. And now spell check: You say” is missing Helloooooooo?
In search of truth in advertising I would like for the two parties to be renamed, based on facts, we could then have the Socialist Party and the Conservative Party.
When the Civil War (part two) begins we Conservatives can wear red bandanas as armbands and/or headbands. Those members of the United American Socialist Party (USAP) can wear blue bandanas. It would make it easier to avoid shooting the wrong person.
Mexico, Central America, Cuba, Venezuela, russia, etc. will begin arming the USAP, since with their
gunaphobia, they are unarmed for the most part. It will be a Nationwide “Red Dawn†and we will either win or America will cease to exist.
Authority for change is plain in our Preamble to our Constitution. “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.â€
I see no room for Communists in there. Their sole purpose is to try and succeed here, where they have failed in every other country where they’ve tried it. I don’t want America to become another Cuba, Venezuela or North Korea.
Heirborn Ranger
19 Ms RightWing, Ink // Jan 30, 2008 at 9:43 pm
From the “Ya Gotta Love Them Democrats Department”
This story was taken from the paper from a small town I used to live in:
CANAL FULTON: After receiving complaints of ‘’suspicious persons,” police on Monday stopped and questioned seven men, who were going door to door in several neighborhoods.
Wayne C. Christopher, of Cleveland, was arrested for soliciting without a permit and on outstanding warrants.
Canal Fulton police said the seven men were working for Working America, a Cleveland-based organization affiliated with the AFL-CIO.
According to police, some of the men stopped had lengthy criminal records.
Two calls seeking comment left on the phone answering machine at Working America were not immediately returned.
According to the Working America Web site, the group uses ”professional research, communication, education, canvassing, lobbying and community organizing to demand that politicians address the priorities that matter most to working people.”
Dallas Association: When Ft Worthians want to hang with their buds to the east
20 everthink // Jan 30, 2008 at 10:18 pm
Mr. McVeigh,
I think the Red and Blue Bandanna idea has already been taken.
The name change idea may have some merit though; but, how about the Progressive Party, and the Regressive Party.
ET
21 everthink // Jan 30, 2008 at 10:33 pm
“Dignified Republican Debate”
Wow, such substance! “You said …” Did not! Did! Did not! Did! Did not! Did! Did not! Did!Did not! Did!
Who would Ronald Reagan have loved more? Me! No me! Me! No me! Me! No me! Me! No me!
Very nice,
ET
22 conserve-a-tips // Jan 30, 2008 at 10:41 pm
pushing on through cuz Neverthink ate my post. Did it taste like chicken??
wv:The conferringcampaign heads singing ♪ How do we solve a problem like Bill-y, yeah? ♪
23 conserve-a-tips // Jan 30, 2008 at 10:46 pm
Hmmm. You really DID eat my post. I said:
The questions were posed by liberal posers posing as media pundits. You get what yer given.
They obviously aimed at pitting the two candidates against each other…kinda reminiscent of Michael Vick and his dogs.
hams Down: He won the debate ‘hams down’? He sat on his opponent.
24 Terry_Jim // Jan 31, 2008 at 12:31 am
10 Set down the coffee
20 GOTO http://ibdeditorials.com/CartoonPopUp.aspx?id=286404366509024
30 snort derisively
25 Maggie // Jan 31, 2008 at 9:03 am
Believe it or not,Ron Paul made the most sence in last night’s debate.
Gerard aft: Gay Admiral
26 gafisher // Jan 31, 2008 at 9:30 am
Funny, TJ Re#24, but those ought to be R(h)inos.
WV: “oldest Government” — self control.
27 boberinyetagain // Jan 31, 2008 at 9:41 am
Funny stuff Scott!
Mrs Boberin turns 50 today, pray for her!
WV= robert and…which is where my “handle” of boberin originated, too wierd!
28 gafisher // Jan 31, 2008 at 9:57 am
Maggie Re#25: RP may have made “sen¢e,” but the dollars all went to CNN and all the political capital stayed with the establishment guys.
As expected, the MSM (well, OK, it’s hard to call a fringe network “mainstream” but y’all know what I mean) tried to frame this as an either-or choice, and McCain and Romney were happy to follow that script, but Paul is closer to real Conservatism than either of them, and Huckabee is the most consistently Conservative of the candidates with executive experience.
We have not been well served by the press in a very long time.
29 JamesonLewis3rd // Jan 31, 2008 at 10:48 am
Yes. We can thank the press for telling us what we want, what we really, really want.
It is quite unfortunate that so many actually believe them.
More unfortunate, however, is the lack of real opposition by those [the majority, IMO] who don’t adhere to their [the press's] deviant views.
BTW: The snark I’m hearing regarding a certain woman I’ve been watching die for the last couple of years on the world-wide stage is making me sick. I, for one, am praying that she makes it.
30 JQ // Jan 31, 2008 at 10:51 am
Terry Jim, RE: 24:
Funny cartoon, but GOTO’s are discouraged these days; put it in an exception handler.
WV: the Dempsey: Dr. McDreamy’s self-administered nickname
31 conserve-a-tips // Jan 31, 2008 at 10:57 am
Today on ABC News:
In a long, and interesting speech, he [Bill Clinton]characterized what the U.S. and other industrialized nations need to do to combat global warming this way: “We just have to slow down our economy and cut back our greenhouse gas emissions ’cause we have to save the planet for our grandchildren.”
At a time that the nation is worried about a recession is that really the characterization his wife would want him making? “Slow down our economy”?
I don’t really think there’s much debate that, at least initially, a full commitment to reduce greenhouse gases would slow down the economy….So was this a moment of candor?
Yep, these people need to be leading this country. Heh Bill, it’s the economy, stupid!!
elephant fax: GOP memo
32 everthink // Jan 31, 2008 at 11:07 am
In The Church of Latter Day Saints,” The Prophet” is not just the title for the “Mormon Popeâ€.
He is also called “The Seer†and “The Revelatorâ€.
Romney’s Campaign may well have lost the Florida Primary because of the illness and death of Prophet Gordon B. Hinckley.
The LDS has had Thomas S. Monson, warming up in anticipation of Hinckley’s drop to room temperature.
Prophet Monson should be able to, not only, guide former governor Romney to victory on Super Tuesday; but also guide The United States in the future.
ET
33 da Bunny // Jan 31, 2008 at 11:12 am
c-a-t, the Clintons, algore, and their ilk only want to destroy this country and it’s citizenry. Easier to seize and keep power when the masses are poor, hungry, and looking to Big Government to meet their needs. They are horrible, evil people, and the dumbed down losers are chomping at the bit to follow their “lead.” The path to Hell is paved with liberalism.
34 everthink // Jan 31, 2008 at 11:37 am
In related news, Senator John McCain has been warming up on the sidelines with a Nerf “Nuclear Football” in hopes of getting into the game.
Dumbyah has refused to allow anybody to even look at HIS “Newqueler Football”, claiming “Executive Privilege”. Those close to “The War President” have indicated intends to take it with him when he leaves next January 20th (that is, if he can find a way to stay in the game).
ET
35 boberinyetagain // Jan 31, 2008 at 11:44 am
da bunny, it’s not good to hold back, you should say how you really feel rather than beating around the bush like that.
You could get an ulcer
wv: padres approaching (along with the rest of baseball season?)
36 everthink // Jan 31, 2008 at 12:10 pm
Re: 23
Michael Vick may have tossed the raw meat in the air, but it was the dumb pups who barked, snarled, and snapped while chasing it around the yard for an hour and a half.
When the two sides meet the raw meat used will be Dumbyah! Since Democrats are fed up, they may just let the Repug eat his fill.
ET
37 upnorthlurkin // Jan 31, 2008 at 12:12 pm
(Is it easier to think with your fingers in your ears, your eyes closed all the while chanting la, la, la, la,la, la?!) Of course the marxist dhimmis want to destroy our way of life…..but not their way of life. They are of course so much more intelligent than we (the rabble) and are entitled to keep their ill gotten gains….but we’re too stupid to know how to properly spend our own money. I’m starting to wonder if the majority of us are too stupid to handle our God given gift of freedom.
38 Fred Sinclair // Jan 31, 2008 at 12:25 pm
“Breaking Bad” a very special movie that was made expressly to prove that no matter how horrible things seem, it could be a whole lot worse.
It would be horrible to have Senators Mrs. Bill Clinton or Obama as President. Now Presidents come and go. We weathered Mr. Jimmy Carter and Mr. Bill Clinton - the horrendous thought lies in the fact that whosoever wins in November will more than likely appoint one or more persons to the Supreme Court.
With all of their many, many drawbacks, with McCain or Romney there is at least a chance of getting one or more much needed Conservative or Conservatives appointed to the bench. Even a slim chance is better than no chance at all.
I find it horrendous to even contemplate the damage to our country if a Democrat President is allowed to stack the Supreme Court with Liberal Judges. Our First and Second Amendment rights will effectively be deleted from the Constitution. Roe vs Wade will continue throughout the lives of these appointees. Same sex marriages could become legal.
There is no way to weigh the ramifications of a Democrat win this November. If God wills it to be so, then, so be it, but I seriously doubt that the America we know (with all of it’s warts, scars and scabs) will continue to exist. I would that Christians everywhere would pray that God will spare America in this time of trials.
Heirborn Ranger
39 gafisher // Jan 31, 2008 at 12:26 pm
et Re#32: Nobody’s death should be a subject for glee. And drop the anti-Mormon bigotry.
wv: “personality parcels” — liberal masks.
40 everthink // Jan 31, 2008 at 12:36 pm
da Bunny,
“Goosfaba”
I know, let’s sing! I’m so pretty …, come on now; I’m so pretty, I’m so happy, and I’m so gay …
OK, OK, try this one, This Little Light of Mine …, come on now don’t hide it under a bushel.
Isn’t that better? Now remember, “Sarcasm is anger’s ugly cousin”.
Yer ol’ Buddy,
ET
41 conserve-a-tips // Jan 31, 2008 at 12:36 pm
Amen GAfisher! #39
Neverthink: I don’t know what country you live in, but in this country a president can only be in office for two terms. Bush is not running for president and is totally out of the picture. And if you want to talk about dogs snapping and snarling, while pointing fingers, you might take a look at your own sorry sack o’ sourpusses and sit on the bleachers at the Obama/Clinton-Clinton fights. They’ve been pretty savage and very unequally weighted - if you get my drift.
offset appropriate: suitably out of balance (like the Obama/Clinton-Clinton fights in the Clintons’ minds)
42 boberinyetagain // Jan 31, 2008 at 12:40 pm
The Chrstian thing to do would be to round up all liberal/democrats and either consign them to New Jersey or just kill them quickly and be done with it.
This is surely our only hope of survival as a country if not as a species. As it is written, so it will be done
wv: taxpayers magistrate…we could use a few of those
Or is “magistrate” a verb in this context? hmmm….
43 da Bunny // Jan 31, 2008 at 1:08 pm
“da bunny, it?s not good to hold back, you should say how you really feel rather than beating around the bush like that.
You could get an ulcer”
I’m glad you appreciated my post, bob.
“da Bunny,
“Goosfabaâ€
I know, let’s sing! I’m so pretty …, come on now; I’m so pretty, I’m so happy, and I’m so gay …
OK, OK, try this one, This Little Light of Mine …, come on now don’t hide it under a bushel.
Isn’t that better? Now remember, “Sarcasm is anger’s ugly cousinâ€.
Yer ol’ Buddy,
ET”
Are you and bob one and the same, or can’t you come up with an original idea of your own? “everthink”?
Since you don’t like the opinions being expressed here at ScrappleFace, why don’t you show your superior intelligence by going somewhere else to read opinions that are more to your liking? I’m not writing opinions that are anything opposite of what the author of this site writes. Why don’t you mouth off to Scott the way you mouth off to the rest of us? Come on…show some manhood. Criticize Scott for being a conservative and a Christian. You’re always criticizing the rest of the conservative Christian regulars here, yet we’re all on the same politcal and social “side” as the author of the site. If we’re all “wrong” according to your vast wisdom, then Scott is wrong, too. What are you doing here reading Scott’s articles, yet only posting your rude insults and sarcasm toward the people here who are agreeing with Scott? No guts, no glory, ET…insult Scott, too. He is and/or provides the catalyst for the posts of the conservative Christians here. Your best rude, sarcastic, and insulting comments should be first reserved for him, right? You reveal your complete immaturity, your ignorance, and your false bravado every time you post here.
Now, you be sure to post a “crushing” reply to me, doing your very best to insult and run me down. As usual, you will fail, and I will go back to ignoring the smell of sulpher that surrounds your posts.
44 everthink // Jan 31, 2008 at 1:20 pm
CAT,
I’m a citizen of The United States. But, I’m not sure what country I live in anymore. The United States was a nation of laws, not of men! We had a constitution, and a “Balance of Power” between our branches of government.
We had a president, not an emperor, whose duty it was to execute our laws, not attach “Signing Statements†ignoring them, and not to violate those laws, and hide the evidence behind “Executive Privilegeâ€, and not to pardon criminals who might otherwise testify against him.
We had a “Bill of Rightsâ€, where no person could be thrown in jail without a fair trial.
My country would never make a preemptive attack another country!
This president in not just incompetent, he has abused his legitimate power, and assume powers the people did not grant him.
He has said of our nation’s most sacred document. “It’s just a (deleted) piece of paper!†It is this document to which requires him to leave office on January 20th, 2009.
ET
45 JQ // Jan 31, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Boberin, RE: 42:
It may just be me, but you appear to be getting a bit more testy lately. The biting sarcasm doesn’t become you, my friend…
The goal is to convert liberal Democrats to a more sensible political worldview. Obviously, this a difficult (if not impossible) goal. However, I don’t think anyone here would honestly advocate booting our Democratic brethren from the country, let alone to…New Jersey…(shudder).
I mean, who would we argue with?
46 boberinyetagain // Jan 31, 2008 at 1:40 pm
JQ,
I was merely reacting to the utter venom that pevades today’s thread. It seems, how to put this…a tad over the top so to speak.
I don’t “live” in either “camp”, I prefer to think on each issue and come up with my own ideas but the “liberals” are taking an unusual beating, I was just trying to guide the thinking into concrete action that could make an actual difference.
I don’t agree with my own suggestion any more than those of others…at least for today
wv: illness nov, that doesn’t bode well, not well at all
47 everthink // Jan 31, 2008 at 1:43 pm
High dB,
Scott seems to be quite able to speak for himself, and he has a valid email address.
So who do you like, Obama or Clinton?
ET
48 JQ // Jan 31, 2008 at 2:39 pm
Boberin, RE: 46:
I think the Scrapplers are beginning to feel the frustration of being forced to choose between a straight-up Democrat and a Democrat in Republican’s clothing. A little venting is to be expected.
I said earlier in the Republican campaign that I felt Romney was the most “electable” Republican running. I just hope the Republican Convention sees it the same way.
WV: was meantime: Now it’s “nicetime;” let’s try to place nice, shall we, everthink?
49 conserve-a-tips // Jan 31, 2008 at 2:55 pm
Neverthink: You live in the USA. You live in a nation of laws governed by a Constitution that is not a living, breathing document, but was penned to mean exactly what it says. Therefore, if you have any problem with the men of today, take it up with the liberals too. They are trying to change it.
Regarding the rest of your post, it appears that you have not read any history or if you have, did not understand it. You live in a nation that split right down the middle and killed hundreds of thousands of people over States’ Rights. You live in a nation that rounded up Japanese within its borders and put them into containment camps. You live in a nation where it is in the Constitution that the government can take your land if it deems it useful for the common good.
You live in a nation where the president is still the president but the media is and has always been the emperor who determines how you feel and think. You live in a land where 100 years ago, the Bill of Rights was only for white men and anyone else was guilty before proven innocent and hanged before proven guilty. You live in a nation that made a preemptive attack on Germany and Italy in WWII because they were fighting against our allies, while simultaneously making a reactive attack on Japan because they attacked us first.
You live in a nation that drove bands of Indians across the country in death marches to relocate them so that the nation could have more land. You live in a nation where a president put a newspaper man in jail because he opposed the president’s decisions during a time of civil war. I could go on, but hopefully you are getting the picture that your nation is a nation, moving forward from the past and going from president to president under the same kinds of problems based on the idea that as in Ecclesiates, “There is nothing new under the sun.”
$140,000,000 Columbia: Chavez sees dollar signs
50 everthink // Jan 31, 2008 at 3:21 pm
gafisher,
et Re#32: Nobody’s death should be a subject for glee. And drop the anti-Mormon bigotry.
No glee here! No sadness either. Gordon B. Hinckley was 97 years old.
I have spent many hours in LDS Family History Centers. I have found LDS people to be genuinely kind and decent people of high moral values.
This said, I have a real concern, not bigotry, about how much influence Salt Lake City may have in the White House.
ET
51 boberinyetagain // Jan 31, 2008 at 4:20 pm
JQ, point taken.
I hear Ralph might jump in again, if so he will get my vote a second time!
wv: targets persistently, did ET think up that one?
52 conserve-a-tips // Jan 31, 2008 at 4:45 pm
OK, so Billy Boy has said that we need to slow down the economy to fix global warming. I’d like him to tell that to his Dem friends who are chomping at the bit to hand out beaucoups dollars to stimulate an allegedly slowing economy. And then I’d like him to explain to them that the economy is at a place where it needs to be slowed down because it is roaring too fast. Either way he’s screwed, with them, in his logic.
bail Pamela: what’d she do??? Inquiring minds want to know.
53 mindknumbed kid // Jan 31, 2008 at 6:52 pm
Pat Paulson has never looked so good…
Or has the rest of the pack never looked so bad ?
54 Darthmeister // Jan 31, 2008 at 11:14 pm
Scott, if we’re talking about bringing “balance” to the ticket, McCain ought to have Chris Matthews onboard as VP to go after the barking moonbat vote.
Anybody else suffer through the Demoncrat
debatelovefest tonight? Sounded like the Donks in the audience were getting ready to coronate a homecoming King and Queen.Talk about two liteweights and no gravitas - Obama spewing his empty left-wing platitudes to the delight of the sheep-to-be-fleeced in the audience and sHrillary shreiking her agreement.
Listening to some post-adolescent wannabe croaking his tone deaf way through “Proud Mary” on American Idol is probably more relevant to the real world than what passes for far-left Democratic policy nowadays. If Charles Manson had a “D” after his name and was running for president he’d still get 98%of the Demoncrat vote. Such is the pathological hatred of liberal Democrats who consider it an honor and duty to put party before country.
55 Darthmeister // Feb 1, 2008 at 12:01 am
We
had(have) a constitution, and a “Balance of Power†between our branches of government.… and it’s still working just fine. Don’t confuse your subjective personal hatred of those who don’t bow to your psuedo-intellectual grandstanding with the government being broken.
Just because your personal policy preferences are ignored (as they should be), doesn’t mean the Constitution has been violated. If government was really broken you would have had your door kicked in and have been dragged off to an existence in a white suit with straps or you would have simply “disappeared” and no one be the wiser. You’re not truly anonymous and your IP# is a matter of record. Just wising you up.
The fact your continue publicly posting your venomous hatred here in complete safety demonstrates what a liar you are … again. Of course that may change one day - probably under a liberal socialist fascist Amerika - but then you probably won’t be around to appreciate your own cleverness since under a thoroughly entrenched left-wing totalitarian systems since useful idiots are usually the first to go.
Nazi national socialists, Soviet Marxist communists and American liberal collectivists can be seen springing from the same anti-Constitutional/anti-free market source once the sheep skin is removed from the wolf. Just look at the lust for power in the eyes of sHrillary and Obama, they are drunk with it. It all adds up to the same thing, a gilded, velvet-lined cage compliments of the left-wing powers-that-be. Be careful what you wish for when you pull that lever this November.
56 Beerme // Feb 1, 2008 at 7:06 am
Boberinyetagain,
Please forward my Happy Belated Birthday to your lovely wife!
57 Beerme // Feb 1, 2008 at 7:07 am
er, uh, hello! hello?
58 Beerme // Feb 1, 2008 at 7:09 am
Boerinyetagain,
Please forward my Happy Belated Birthday to your wife, whatever(in) her name is…
Post..disappearing…annoying…
59 JamesonLewis3rd // Feb 1, 2008 at 7:20 am
If you will be casting a ballot this coming Tuesday, please, I beg of you, take your choices to their logical conclusions and do the right thing. [no pun intended]
Proactive Cognizance
Thank you
60 gafisher // Feb 1, 2008 at 7:21 am
Darth Re#55: “… useful idiots are usually the first to go.”
Second, actually; first they’re tortured until they’ve betrayed everyone they can think of.
wv=RAFTER was … Huckleberry Finn.
61 gafisher // Feb 1, 2008 at 7:28 am
Not that anyone was fooled, but here’s the truth about McCain’s historical and presumptive stance on tax cuts. Also a bit about his poor reading of the last election.
62 Darthmeister // Feb 1, 2008 at 10:45 am
gafisher,
I stand corrected.
63 Fake Edwards Fake Endorses McCain « Axis of Right // Feb 1, 2008 at 12:01 pm
[...] by Mike on February 1, 2008 Well sort of.  Can a fake endorsement of a fake Republican become a real one if the candidate who gives it is also a fake?  Sometimes [...]
64 everthink // Feb 1, 2008 at 1:15 pm
“Such is the pathological hatred of liberal Democrats who consider it an honor and duty to put party before country.”
What do you know of “Honor and Duty�
“Don’t confuse your subjective personal hatred of those who don’t bow to your psuedo-intellectual grandstanding with the government being broken.”
Did you mean to say “Pseudo-intellectual� Now, that you know how to spell it, maybe you can look up its meaning.
It seems to me, that writing posts that are hundreds of words long, filled with words even the writer doesn’t understand is a better example of trying to appear intellectual.
Thanks for “wising me up†about IP. I have never thought I was beyond the reach of the neo-cons; but, just in case, I have taken the precaution of placing the details of several posts in a contingency record.
Now, let me “wise you up” some: Investigations of this administration will continue after next January 20th.
As to your observation: “Talk about two liteweights and no gravitas - Obama spewing his empty left-wing platitudes to the delight of the sheep-to-be-fleeced in the audience and sHrillary shreiking (shrieking) her agreement.â€
I watched all of both debates. I saw something very different. I look forward to the “debate” between the choice of our two parties.
What about Rush, or Hannity as your number two? Now, I’d really like that!
ET
65 Fred Sinclair // Feb 2, 2008 at 4:32 pm
Seems there’s some pretty sound reverse reasoning on McCain. Ann Coulter has already said that if McCain gets the RNC’s nod, she will campaign for HillBilly.
If McCain’s president, the Congressional Republicans may vote with him (a horror) while if She is President they’ll vote against her and actually be very effective in blocking her wishes.
An excerpt from her latest article:
“That helps, but why would any Republican vote for McCain?
At least under President Hillary, Republicans in Congress would know that they’re supposed to fight back. When President McCain proposes the same ideas — tax hikes, liberal judges and Social Security for illegals — Republicans in Congress will support “our” president — just as they supported, if only briefly, Bush’s great ideas on amnesty and Harriet Miers.”
Heirborn Ranger
You must log in to post a comment.