ScrappleFace: News Fairly Unbalanced. We Report. You Decipher  




Top ScrappleFace Stories...



Bush, Putin Agree: Iran Seeks Peace with Nukes

by Scott Ott for ScrappleFace · 48 Comments · · Print This Story Print This Story

(2007-10-16) — President George Bush today agreed with Russian President Vladimir Putin that Iran’s pursuit of nuclear technology is “ultimately aimed at a lasting peace.”

Mr. Putin, visiting Tehran for talks with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, defended Iran’s right to “peaceful nuclear activities“.

Mr. Bush said he agrees with his Russian counterpart that Mr. Ahmadinejad “has been secretly seeking peace for years, as he brought centrifuges on line to enrich plutonium.”

“I think that Ahmadinejad envisions a peaceful future, ushered in by Iranian nuclear power,” said Mr. Bush, “He foresees a time of absolute calm in Israel, when even the crickets fall into reverent silence … a day when every hill and mountain shall be made low, and the rough places smooth as glass. I think he wishes to help the United States find that same kind of peace.”

Mr. Bush added that he can trust Mr. Putin’s eyewitness analysis of the situation in Tehran.

“As you know, I’ve looked into Putin’s soul,” said Mr. Bush, “and I know that he’s not influenced at all by the billion dollar unfinished nuclear reactor that the Russians are building for Iran, nor by the upcoming parliamentary elections in Russia when he hopes to make the transition from president to prime minister.”

“As the kids say,” Mr. Bush added, “Putin’s got our back.”

Similar ScrappleFace News:



Tags: Global News

48 responses so far ↓

  • 1 boberinyetagain // Oct 16, 2007 at 10:17 am

    If Achmed had the support of his boss or his people and if he had a cloaking device that would allow his planes to go undetected and, given all that, if he had a weapon, then boy, we would be in trouble!

    Goodness gracious, that would be bad

  • 2 Darthmeister // Oct 16, 2007 at 10:50 am

    It appears Ahmadamnutjob believes love means never having to say your sorry for having nukes. Muslim jihadists and thugs certainly give new meaning to loving people to death.

  • 3 RedPepper // Oct 16, 2007 at 12:52 pm

    Rest in Peace.

  • 4 conserve-a-tips // Oct 16, 2007 at 12:55 pm

    Riiigggghhhhtttt. Methinks that the POTUS is imbibing in too much LOTUS with the Dahli Lhama…Lhama…Lhama…Lhama..dingdong.

  • 5 Roguet55 // Oct 16, 2007 at 12:58 pm

    That why we have that sharp pain in the middle of our spine, it’s Putin with our back.
    Not to mention the wonderful job he’s done at the UN with the Chinese for us.
    With friends like that, who needs enemies?

  • 6 Ms RightWing, Ink // Oct 16, 2007 at 1:08 pm

    Bombs away-Geronimo

    Or like Slim Pickens said, “Yahoo.”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueuauKKjPZI

  • 7 boberinyetagain // Oct 16, 2007 at 1:11 pm

    I love it when a plan comes together and this one sure sounds like it is.

  • 8 University Update - Vladimir Putin - Bush, Putin Agree: Iran Seeks Peace with Nukes // Oct 16, 2007 at 1:51 pm

    [...] Clark Bush, Putin Agree: Iran Seeks Peace with Nukes » This Summary is from an article posted at ScrappleFace — News Fairly Unbalanced. We Report. You [...]

  • 9 da Bunny // Oct 16, 2007 at 2:00 pm

    “I think that Ahmadinejad envisions a peaceful future, ushered in by Iranian nuclear power,” said Mr. Bush, “He foresees a time of absolute calm in Israel, when even the crickets fall into reverent silence … a day when every hill and mountain shall be made low, and the rough places smooth as glass. I think he wishes to help the United States find that same kind of peace.”

    Not if we can put you on that “peace” path first, Mr. Ahma-dhimmicrat!

  • 10 da Bunny // Oct 16, 2007 at 2:10 pm

    Apparently, Randi Rhodes wasn’t mugged…more lies from the left!!!
    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/10/16/2007-10-16_air_america_host_randi_rhodes_wasnt_mugg.html

  • 11 woodnwheel // Oct 16, 2007 at 2:13 pm

    RedPepper // Oct 16, 2007 at 12:52 pm

    Rest in Peace.

    I think you mean “Rest in Pieces.”

    Forgive the baseball analogy, but another one knocked right out of the park, Scott!

  • 12 The Great Santini // Oct 16, 2007 at 2:17 pm

    Vlad the Impaler and Ahmedine-Jock-Itch, together forever. The Louse, the Mouse, a billion rubles, and a Persian heat wave-did Bush43 see that when he looked into Vlad’s black-hole soul?

  • 13 random // Oct 16, 2007 at 2:30 pm

    Peace through annihilation

  • 14 University Update - George W Bush - Bush, Putin Agree: Iran Seeks Peace with Nukes // Oct 16, 2007 at 2:52 pm

    [...] Clark Bush, Putin Agree: Iran Seeks Peace with Nukes » This Summary is from an article posted at ScrappleFace — News Fairly Unbalanced. We Report. You [...]

  • 15 RedPepper // Oct 16, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    boberin #10: Be serious. The Iranians don’t need planes.

    Iran’s ICBM Capabilities

    … not to mention their surrogates, such as Hezbollah, who would be happy to help them “deliver” a little surprise to Israel, as well as other groups that are controlled directly by Iran, or for that matter the free-lancers who would love to get their hands on nuclear materials … really, the possibilities are too varied to enumerate …

  • 16 antodav // Oct 16, 2007 at 3:28 pm

    If Achmed had the support of his boss or his people and if he had a cloaking device that would allow his planes to go undetected and, given all that, if he had a weapon, then boy, we would be in trouble!
    Goodness gracious, that would be bad

    OK, first of all, why would they need planes if they’ve got missiles (notwithstanding the fact that the Chinese and the Russians are helping them with both)?

    Second of all, why would Ahmadenijad need a cloaking device? As admittedly cool as that would be (well, not so much in the hands of the Iranians, but still), without SDI or any other sort of missile defense system whatsoever, the United States and Israel are both vulnerable whether Iran does or does not have some sort of advanced stealth technology (besides which, everyone knows that a bird-of-prey can’t fire while cloaked).
    Third of all, since when have dictators needed the support of their people to attack other countries? In a dictatorship, not having the support of the people is easily solved by the government-with firing squads.

    Fourth of all, why are liberals in such utter and complete denial of the threat posed by Iran? Is it because “Death to America” is just not “nuanced” enough for them to understand, or is it because they agree with the sentiment?

  • 17 gafisher // Oct 16, 2007 at 3:39 pm

    Ahmadenijad might have trouble coming up with a cloaking device, but there could be a shroud in his future if he rouses the hornets.

  • 18 everthink // Oct 16, 2007 at 3:59 pm

    Santini,

    Re: N0. 11.

    The problem seems to be that Putin looked back, deep into Dumbyah’s eyes.

    ET

    Santini,
    The problem seems to be that Putin looked back, deep into Dumbyah’s eyes.

    ET

  • 19 everthink // Oct 16, 2007 at 4:00 pm

    Oops!

  • 20 conserve-a-tips // Oct 16, 2007 at 4:03 pm

    Neverthink, you’re drinking again…should that be Everdrink?

  • 21 RedPepper // Oct 16, 2007 at 4:11 pm

    The heartbreak of BDS

  • 22 Ms RightWing, Ink // Oct 16, 2007 at 4:14 pm

    re:4

    Major Kong may soon be filtered out so if you like Slim better hurry.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueuauKKjPZI

    You tube is getting sued for copyright infringement so they installed a filter but the only one I have seen zapped was Frankenstein dancing (Young Frankenstein)

    Classic Major Kong ride into the Valley of Ahmadinejad. Well, not really, it was the Soviet Union, but we can pretend, can’t we?

  • 23 Ms RightWing, Ink // Oct 16, 2007 at 4:19 pm

    Oh, and if you don’t like Slim Pickens rub your stomach and the top of your head at the same time and then press the asterick below.

    *

    Thank you. Your name will now be taken off all government files under “Slim Pickens Fan.”

    Void where prohibited by law

  • 24 boberinyetagain // Oct 16, 2007 at 4:45 pm

    He is not a dictator, he is elected and from what I read not all that popular, unlikly to be re-elected.
    His boss is a dictator and he isn’t talking. He is also likely not dim enough to launch an attack (currently nearly guaranteed due to lack of meaningful weapons)
    and, once more, I’m not getting sucked into any more “boogymen of the month” clubs. We all got sucked in once and that boy “cried wolf” so we attacked a basically defensless country for no good reason and now we are stuck there.
    We tried to make nutjob young-ill seem dangerous but, drat the luck, it turns out he isn’t so much, he’s just nutty

  • 25 Darthmeister // Oct 16, 2007 at 4:49 pm

    … Mel Brooks ate my post.

  • 26 egospeak // Oct 16, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    Bober, almost all dictators are elected or after they take power, have elections where their position of power is ratified. Amazingly enough they nearly aways get 90+ % of the vote. Don’t you remember Saddam’s last election before we threw him out?
    As to your suggestion that the little nutjob is unpopular and may not be re-elected, rest assured that if he is on the ballot, he will win in a landslide. Election observer Jimmah Cartah, who has never seen a dictator he didn’t admire, will make sure of it. And in the off chance that he’s not on the ballot, I can assure you that whoever is on the ballot will have the approval of the mullahs and will win in a landslide.

    It is not a question of whether he is dim enough to launch a nuclear attack on Israel or the U.S. The question is whether he is a true believer and is convinced that bringing on the apocalypse will cause the return of the 12th Imam. I don’t believe that, and I know you don’t believe that, but the little nutjob does. Just list to what he says.

    There is a huge difference between the little nutjob and nutjob young- ill. Nutjob young-ill is driven by his communist ideology, the little nutjob by religious fervor. In the long run, especially from a Muslim point of view, religious fervor trumps political ideology every time. Politicians can, for the most part, be reasoned with. Mutually assured destruction, whatever you may think of it, worked with the old Soviet Union. I don’t think it will work with people who look at suicide bombing, flying jets into skyscrapers and the like, in the name of their religion, as a promotion or doing god’s will.

    Regards,

  • 27 egospeak // Oct 16, 2007 at 5:33 pm

    make that “Just listen to what he says”

  • 28 JamesonLewis3rd // Oct 16, 2007 at 6:49 pm

    “…..that boy “cried wolf” so we attacked a basically defensless [sic] country for no good reason…..”
    :shock:
    You’ve got to be kidding.

    Myths, cliches and lies. Why waste your time? All you’re doing is demonstrating (for the millionth time) that you don’t have even the remotest clue beyond the Clinton/Soros/Socialist Talking Points-don’t you have any self-respect at all?

  • 29 its-just-me // Oct 16, 2007 at 6:54 pm

    I think he means that Saddam was just a poor defenseless public servant…

    Wouldn’t surprise me.

  • 30 Maggie // Oct 16, 2007 at 7:10 pm

    OT
    Santini…..did you get my email ?It was sent out approx a week ago.

  • 31 Maggie // Oct 16, 2007 at 7:20 pm

    Ms Right Wing,

    We must also nary forget Boxcar Willy.

  • 32 everthink // Oct 16, 2007 at 7:38 pm

    Lynn Cheney said today that her husband is an 11th cousin of Obama.

    Could she be a Hillary supporter?

  • 33 Darthmeister // Oct 16, 2007 at 8:49 pm

    As violence falls in Iraq, cemetery workers are earning less.
    Well, the lamestream media always has to see the dark lining of silver clouds, I guess. But we all know death is a cottage industry in the Middle East, just ask Young Frankenstein. And wouldn’t you know it, Gene Wilder, the actor who played the young Frankenstein is actually a Jooooooo whose real name was Jerome Silberman.

    And the conspiracy thickens, dear comrades. The creator and director of the film Young Frankenstein, Mel Brooks, is also a Jooooooo!!! And the conspiracy continues right beneath our very noses. Gene Wilder was married to Gilda Radner (her real name) who was born into a rich Zionist Jooooooo Detroit family! Oh yes, it’s true, true I say.

    So you see, a rising tide raises all ships, but then barnacle scrapers go unemployed and their children starve because of evil multi-national corporations who are taking food off their table and giving it to the rich … rich people who are buying expensives yachts and keep “little Eichmann” shipswrights employed. Let us curse the Moon and the tides it creates. What a cruel, harsh world we live in where neo-cons, Zionist Joooooos and the Moon conspire to have us all working in the lead mines of mediocrity.

    DYSLEXIC WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNTIE! Let us throw off the yoke of our neo-con and Zionist Jooooo overlords! Out with the Jooooo bankers and up with a government which will promise to take care of us from cradle to grave. ALL PRAISE TO THE STATE*!

    *Hopeful words uttered to citizen THX 1138 by a government psycho-analytical computer that looked suspiciously like a reel-to-reel tape recorder.

  • 34 RedPepper // Oct 16, 2007 at 10:28 pm

    its-just-me #28: Kindly, caring, uncle Saddam.

    Yup! That sounds about right …

  • 35 everthink // Oct 16, 2007 at 11:24 pm

    So, you’re saying the invasion of Iraq was a horrible blunder. That it was planned by Mel Brooks, and that Cheney is like Dr. Frankenstein, and Dumbyah is like his monster who destroys stuff because Gilda Radner rejected him in favor Jerome Silberman. Who changed his name to Gene Wilder to hide from Dumbyah. Now, “The Decider” is going through all the phone records looking for Frankenstein.

    Or did I, with my dyslexia, misunderstand?

    What’s up with all the “Joooooo!!!” stuff? Did you get another new shirt?

    ET

  • 36 camojack // Oct 17, 2007 at 12:46 am

    Peace through superior firepower!

  • 37 random // Oct 17, 2007 at 6:58 am

    my Uncle is a sad man.

  • 38 gafisher // Oct 17, 2007 at 11:09 am

    Bober Re#24; whew! Up your dosage, my friend, or reduce it, as the case may be!

    “… and from what I read not all that popular, unlikly to be re-elected.” Yeah, they said that about the first Hitler.

    “… we attacked a basically defensless country for no good reason and now we are stuck there.” Perhaps you’re referring to Germany or Japan? Italy? By defenseless I presume you mean “lacking in effective diplomats,” as all of those countries, like the more recent example of Iraq, were considered a military threat at the time by most free nations.

  • 39 gafisher // Oct 17, 2007 at 11:13 am

    Certainly Bush and Putin both want peace; the difference is in the definition. To Bush and Conservatives, “peace” is the absence of war or its necessity. To Putin and the Left, “peace” is the absence of opposition or opponents.

  • 40 random // Oct 17, 2007 at 1:28 pm

    Heh Heh

  • 41 Darthmeister // Oct 17, 2007 at 1:35 pm

    The “Jooooo” stuff comes directly from left-wing bloggers, even the more supposedly reputable left-wing sites like moveon.org, kos.com, and demoncrapunderground.com.

    Inherent in the left-wing ideology is that “Zionists” (codeword for “Jooooooos”) are pulling the strings of President Bush and the “neo-cons” (more code originally meaning conservative or Republican Jews) to fight their war against Muslims and anti-capitalists. Like the leftist collectivist Hitler and his socialist minions believed, Jooooooos were the scourge of the earth who masterminded any number of financial conspiracies to keep white Germans impoverished during the global depression. And the worst kind of capitalist was a Joooooish capitalist, yada, yada. I personally find it interesting that the Russian Soviets, Nazis and American liberals are all socialist collectivists who villify capitalists and free market capitalists. Birds of feather, I guess.

    Moonbat Sheehan and many other movers and shakers on the anti-war left have let slip any number of times their belief that “Zionist” (Jews) were behind 9/11 and wanted America to get into a war in the Middle East so that the “Israelis” (Jews) wouldn’t have to die fighting a racist war. That is, America is unwittingly doing the dirty work of the elders of Zion (Jews), blah, blah, blah.

    All you have to do is follow the comment threads and catch this left-wing anti-Semitism before it often gets deleted.

  • 42 everthink // Oct 17, 2007 at 5:41 pm

    You’re back to Hitler was socialist schpeel again.

    If, I recall correctly you have said Democrats also socialists, is that right?

  • 43 everthink // Oct 17, 2007 at 5:41 pm

    Dang dyslexia!

  • 44 prettyold // Oct 17, 2007 at 10:25 pm

    Ever think God’s trying to tell you something?

  • 45 everthink // Oct 17, 2007 at 11:51 pm

    prettyold,

    Yes, poor thing, not unlike Albert Schweitzer, I am called to go deep into the darkest jungle with my little light. Everthink God’s trying to tell you something?

    Say, I don’t suppose you saw MSM tonight, “your choice” is now at 24% in the polls. That’s getting close to the handful left here.

    Many notables here have bugged out like Dumbyah in Alabama (during a war). Except he had all that expensive training!

    460 days!

  • 46 The Great Santini // Oct 18, 2007 at 11:52 am

    Maggie: re # 29-nope. OLA and da Bunny have my correct e-addy. Try again.

  • 47 My Telegraph : Cheech : October 2007 // Oct 22, 2007 at 10:19 pm

    [...] (2007-10-16) — President George Bush today agreed with Russian President Vladimir Putin that Iran’s pursuit of nuclear technology is “ultimately aimed at a lasting peace.” Mr. Putin, visiting Tehran for talks with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, defended Iran’s right to “peaceful nuclear activities“. Mr. Bush said he agrees with his Russian counterpart that Mr. Ahmadinejad “has been secretly seeking peace for years, as he brought centrifuges on line to enrich plutonium.” “I think that Ahmadinejad envisions a peaceful future, ushered in by Iranian nuclear power,” said Mr. Bush, “He foresees a time of absolute calm in Israel, when even the crickets fall into reverent silence … a day when every hill and mountain shall be made low, and the rough places smooth as glass. I think he wishes to help the United States find that same kind of peace.” Mr. Bush added that he can trust Mr. Putin’s eyewitness analysis of the situation in Tehran. “As you know, I’ve looked into Putin’s soul,” said Mr. Bush, “and I know that he’s not influenced at all by the billion dollar unfinished nuclear reactor that the Russians are building for Iran, nor by the upcoming parliamentary elections in Russia when he hopes to make the transition from president to prime minister.” “As the kids say,” Mr. Bush added, “Putin’s got our back.” http://www.scrappleface.com/ [...]

  • 48 Aliens versus Predator Extinction » Bush, Putin Agree: Iran Seeks Peace with Nukes // Nov 11, 2007 at 2:49 am

    [...] Wilson Rothman wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt(2007-10-16) — President George Bush today agreed with Russian President Vladimir Putin that Iran’s pursuit of nuclear technology is “ultimately aimed at a lasting peace.” Mr. Putin, visiting Tehran for talks with Iranian President … [...]

You must log in to post a comment.