As President Obama marked the one-year anniversary of his election by blaming his predecessor for the failure to convert the promise of “hope and change” into legislation and policy, a top White House official reported ongoing talks with associates of George W. Bush about “presidential library co-location.”
[READ THE REST at The Washington Examiner]
21 responses so far ↓
1 Hawkeye_R // Nov 6, 2009 at 1:51 pm
What happened to my comment? Did you delete it Scott?
2 ScrappleFace // Nov 6, 2009 at 2:00 pm
Yes.
Scott Ott
Sent from iPhone
3 Upnorthlurkin // Nov 6, 2009 at 2:07 pm
Uh-oh… unemployment at 10.2%….
Up here, we have the lowest in the nation……We're finally first at something!!
4 ChileSerrano // Nov 6, 2009 at 3:16 pm
If G.W. Bush didn't exist, Obama would have had to invent him.
After all, Barack has to have something to blame all our continuing problems on ! Remember "Snowball" in Animal Farm ?
5 Libby_Gone // Nov 6, 2009 at 3:30 pm
OT,
Just want to send a prayer out.
Someone just crossed the line,
and those Korans he handed out will be handed back in time.
6 Upnorthlurkin // Nov 6, 2009 at 4:40 pm
Are you sayin' then that Obey-Me is "Napoleon"?!
7 JamesonLewis3rd // Nov 6, 2009 at 5:58 pm
BHO has much in common with the infamous narcissists of yore.
~~~~~
The despondent image this line projects upon me is apocalyptic in the bleakest possible sense. I can't help it. Maybe I should cut down on my Military Channel viewing.
God Bless America
8 RAM1 // Nov 6, 2009 at 7:58 pm
JL3: That sounds a LOT like what is said about a person when they are in grieving for a loved one who has died!
Well, there was the two losses on Tuesday, but that cannot be it. "O" was so disinterested about the outcome, he was watching "some ballgame".
At least that is what he said. :-O
9 Hawkeye_R // Nov 6, 2009 at 7:59 pm
Understood. I appreciate your sensitivity.
10 Hawkeye_R // Nov 6, 2009 at 7:59 pm
Understood. I appreciate your sensitivity.
11 JamesonLewis3rd // Nov 6, 2009 at 10:33 pm
OT:
From American Thinker, an article from Fort Hood.
12 mindknumbedkid // Nov 7, 2009 at 3:25 am
The shooter at Fort Hood said he was a Muslim first, and an American second. So why was he in the Army?
13 ChileSerrano // Nov 7, 2009 at 4:55 am
mkk : " So why was he in the Army?"
Silly question, mkk. He was in the Army so that Uncle Sugar could foot the bills for his medical education and training, of course …
14 mindknumbedkid // Nov 7, 2009 at 8:27 pm
Does he qualify for the 70 virgins now, or not? That's the question.
15 SGT_USMC_1ea // Nov 8, 2009 at 12:52 am
Scott,
It was so close on the election. Makes you wonder about Acorn and such. With such a huge incumbent Your results were amazing. You will make it yet! God Bless and God's speed.
16 SGT_USMC_1ea // Nov 8, 2009 at 12:55 am
Red Pepper,
Who told you it was ok to be sarcastic? You cut it out too MKK,
17 mindknumbedkid // Nov 8, 2009 at 1:46 am
Hindsight is 20/20, but now there are articles being written that tell us this shooter would have been confronted about his views, if only someone in the Army had had the 'nads to say something to a Muslim…oh me. I'm also getting the idea that there are quite a few converts among the Army ranks, probably still a small percentage, but if they are getting away with holding anti-American views in regard to Iraq and Afghanistan we have a major problem that must be dealt with now. Interesting that there seem to be mosques conveniently located within close proximity of most Army posts. Are they working from within our ranks to weaken the Army?
18 mindknumbedkid // Nov 8, 2009 at 1:49 am
Me???? Sarcastic?
19 camojack // Nov 9, 2009 at 6:00 am
"The joint library agreement contains a contingency that would allow Obama to abandon the deal, and establish his own facility, should his presidency ever result in concrete accomplishment, or anything for which he is willing to take responsibility. "
Ummm…yeah. Sounds as though the "deal" will proceed as is, then.
But how is the motto you mentioned rendered in Texan? Inquiring minds, an' all…
20 mindknumbedkid // Nov 10, 2009 at 1:29 am
With all of the information that is coming out about the Fort Hood .shooter, is the Army and Dept of Homeland security guilty of reckless endangerment?
Reckless endangerment: A person commits the crime of reckless endangerment if the person recklessly engages in conduct which creates a substantial risk of serious physical injury to another person. “Reckless” conduct is conduct that exhibits a culpable disregard of foreseeable consequences to others from the act or omission involved. The accused need not intentionally cause a resulting harm or know that his conduct is substantially certain to cause that result. The ultimate question is whether, under all the circumstances, the accused’s conduct was of that heedless nature that made it actually or imminently dangerous to the rights or safety of others.
21 RAM1 // Nov 11, 2009 at 3:40 am
Maybe there should be a joint library with Bush 41 and Clinton. These guys seem to LOVE being with each other!
You must log in to post a comment.