(2008-10-27) — In addition to spreading the wealth around, Democrat presidential nominee Barack Obama today said the unfair distribution of a woman’s right to choose is part of “the unfinished business of the civil rights movement.”
“Although every woman has the theoretical right to choose an abortion, thanks to the Supreme Court’s discovery of the Constitution’s implied right to privacy,” said Sen. Obama, “only a small percentage of women actually get abortions. This means that the vast majority of women are missing out on the benefits of exercising their Constitutional right. It’s like having the right to free speech, but never speaking.”
In addition, Sen. Obama noted, the distribution of abortions in the U.S. skews unfairly toward blacks, Hispanics and low income women, despite the fact that white female leaders for years have made it clear that abortion is their most treasured Constitutional right.
“It’s not enough to be a land of equal opportunity,” he said. “The American dream is merely a hollow promise if we don’t have equal results. The best way to achieve that is through laws that ensure that every wealthy, white woman actually gets what so many of her poor, black sisters already enjoy…not just the right to choose, but the genuine fruit of that right, a successful abortion.”
63 responses so far ↓
1 Hawkeye // Oct 27, 2008 at 8:27 am
If I were a woman, I would choose to “pass”. As a Scrappler, I choose to laugh…
2 camojack // Oct 27, 2008 at 8:40 am
Too bad Obama’s well-to-do White mother didn’t exercise her right to that choice, instead of inflicting him on the rest of us…
3 gafisher // Oct 27, 2008 at 9:17 am
Enforcinger, Implementing this essential facet of civil rights would go beyond the ability of both the Court and the Legislature. Redistribution of Choice would undoubtedly offer new opportunities for a repurposed military.4 gafisher // Oct 27, 2008 at 10:14 am
A respected and experienced journalist (with whose politics I probably wouldn’t agree) warns his colleagues [here] that they are all but guaranteeing their own doom.
5 onlineanalyst // Oct 27, 2008 at 10:22 am
Bill Whittle has Obama’s number. The Boy King intends to rewrite our Constitution in order to create his vision of Utopia. In the meantime, he will search for SC Justices who will determine penumbras that will have our heads spinning or on the chopping block.
Obama does not itend to uphold the Constitution; he intends to subvert it.
6 Ms RightWing, Ink // Oct 27, 2008 at 10:25 am
gafisher
I said the same thing in my post yesterday. When I say on a blog, or in a mixed crowd that I was/am a journalist then I get thrown to the level of pond scum.
Sad. I became a journalist to offer a new voice in the liberal media back in the mid 90s’.
But 18 years later, the voice is being muffled. The Akron Beacon Journal, as late as this morning erased my comments on their blog page. This happens over and over. No hate speech, just facts and sometimes a little satire.
Which by the way, this area does not understand political satire. I was told that by several large papers when I moved here in 1998. Now satire is hate speech.
’nuff said
7 Ms RightWing, Ink // Oct 27, 2008 at 10:31 am
THIS HAS BEEN BROADCAST ON TALK RADIO ALL MORNING BUT…
if you have not heard it yet, you must listen to Obama. The mask is off.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck
8 Ms RightWing, Ink // Oct 27, 2008 at 10:34 am
Hmm, blog number 6 is being moderated. I know it is looking for bad words, but that is what happens when I say h*te speech.
Happens every day.
9 gafisher // Oct 27, 2008 at 11:31 am
Ms RW, Ink Re#6 [now out of embargo
]: the voice of honest journalism is being more than just muffled. It’s being methodically silenced. I suspect Malone may only have touched the surface; if Obama wins and has his way, New Media is dead, at least as a medium of Free Speech. Would you care to guess what you’ll need for each of the multitude of bureaucratic levels of licensed blogging?
Who here remembers FidoNet? Who thinks it’ll be back?
10 Ms RightWing, Ink // Oct 27, 2008 at 11:46 am
Television advertising for McCain is impossible, at least here in NE Ohio where Barracky has bought up ALL of prime time slots on TV and radio.
Who is buying up all that time???? Not Barracky himself.
This gimmick is much like Baracky Hussein’s attack to win his Illinois seat where he systematically destroyed the records of all of his opponents.
Preaching to the choir? Yes I know but I have been banned in my local liberal outlets.
11 J. Cougar Melancholy // Oct 27, 2008 at 1:24 pm
You are The Boss… which team would you hire?
With America facing historic debt, 2 wars, stumbling health care, a
weakened dollar, all-time high prison population, mortgage crises,
bank foreclosures, etc.
Educational Background:
Obama:
Columbia University - B.A. Political Science with a Specialization in
International Relations.
Harvard - Juris Doctor (J.D.) Magna Cum Laude
Biden:
University of Delaware - B.A. in History and B.A. in Political Science.
Syracuse University College of Law - Juris Doctor (J.D.)
vs.
McCain:
United States Naval Academy - Class rank: 894 of 899
Palin:
Hawaii Pacific University - 1 semester
North Idaho College - 2 semesters - general study
University of Idaho - 2 semesters - journalism
Matanuska-Susitna College - 1 semester
University of Idaho - 3 semesters - B.A. in Journalism
Hmmm. Or is it really down to who would make the best pastor?
12 JamesonLewis3rd // Oct 27, 2008 at 1:50 pm
No, it is down to who will destroy The Constitution of the United States of America: BO, and who will defend it: John Sidney McCain III.
13 Ms RightWing, Ink // Oct 27, 2008 at 2:10 pm
I would choose Palin/McCain. Why ask?
14 BlackLion31U // Oct 27, 2008 at 2:13 pm
Chuck Hagel is a man I can respect, a man I could vote for as President. Ot of curiosity, how many here would agree with that?
Long read, but well worth it.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/11/03/081103fa_fact_bruck?printable=true
15 NeaL // Oct 27, 2008 at 2:24 pm
A message which needs to get out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93cFOjDG-Ks
And this pretty rose saves her thorn for the very end:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAHm8hpF8u4
Ouch!
16 Fred Sinclair // Oct 27, 2008 at 3:34 pm
Just in from one of Letty’s kinfolk -
Hi Fred. I just talked to her last night. She still lacks her phone service, TV service and internet service all from the same provider. The techs or repairmen are suppose to come there today, she had to call “new customer service” to get through. There is service 4 doors away. She is also waiting for workers to replace 5 doors and a window or two. I think she would still like to get away from there for awhile, I don’t blame her.
17 JamesonLewis3rd // Oct 27, 2008 at 3:46 pm
I have no respect for Hagel and could never vote for a faux Republican like him.
18 gafisher // Oct 27, 2008 at 3:55 pm
BL31U Re#14, there are many people — not just men — for whom I could happily cast my vote for the Presidency. In the end, though, only one candidate will win, and in this election it is as important to consider who I believe would NOT lead this country well as it was in the Primaries to decide who best represented my views.
My Primary choice is no longer in the running for one of the major Parties. Under other circumstances I would support that candidate anyway, if they were on the ballot, though they would not win, just to show my support. But this year there’s no room for such symbolism; this year I have to wield my ballot as a shield in defense of my country by voting for the candidate most likely to defeat the person who is favored by this country’s enemies.
â€
19 BlackLion31U // Oct 27, 2008 at 4:35 pm
JL3,
If Hagel is a “faux Republican”, please tell me who represents a true Republican today.
Do you consider George W. Bush a “faux Republican as well?
20 J. Cougar Melancholy // Oct 27, 2008 at 4:48 pm
Ted Stevens convictarooni!
It’s about time for another gay Republican scandal to really punctuate this administration.
Come on, vote for Obama and join the young, hip, cool, modern, forward-thinking, metropolitan intelligentsia!
li’ Pink Houses in which Democrats have more fun, y’all
Cougster - Maverick Troll
21 Beerme // Oct 27, 2008 at 6:08 pm
Palin went into that corrupt Republican old boys’ club and beat them senseless, taking the Gubernatorial prize from one of the club members. Now instead of being hailed as an accomplished feminist, she’s a dumb, uneducated, hausfrau in wayyy over her head with sophisticated intellectuals such as Obama and Biden (ha!).
Isn’t the Congress pretty much filled with over-educated lawyers and such? How’s that been workin; out for ya so far JCM? More of the same? Nah, now we got a genyoowine leftist in charge. That’ll make difference!
Biden is such a regular guy. drinking at Katies, visiting all the plumbers in his neighborhood, walking the streets of Scranton (where he left at age ten, in 1951)…I’m sure the fine education he got helped him to hone those great prevarication skills.
I’ll take Palin (Y’all can have McCain).
22 JamesonLewis3rd // Oct 27, 2008 at 6:19 pm
If you are a member of the so-called “intelligentsia,” I would not suggest calling attention to yourself under the BO socialist regime. Just ask the so-called “intelligentsia” of Russia or China…..oh, wait…..
They’re the first to go, aren’t they…..
Oh, and by the way, open your eyeballs: George W. Bush is not running in this election.
23 Darthmeister // Oct 27, 2008 at 6:28 pm
The Media’s Presidential Bias and Decline.
Ooops, gafisher beat me to it again. I’ll post it anyway.
BTW, if the President is sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution, how can he participate in any kind of effort to create a new constitution. Personally I believe any attempt by the Donks to rewrite the present Constitution or create a new constitution will push this nation into major civil unrest … dare I say, a civil war? Maybe then we’ll get a new republic under the old Constitution.
24 Darthmeister // Oct 27, 2008 at 6:39 pm
What’s really amazing to me is how ObaMao and his clanking cadre of calamitous communists can spend nearly $700 million dollars, have another $100 million in illegal foreign donations, have groups like ACORN and other “community organizers” engaged in submitting nearly a million fraudlent Democratic voter registrations, and have the national socialist media shilling for him every step of the way and the man is only 2.5% to 4% ahead in the polls.
But then again, he is messiah and he has to make it look like it was a miracle he won!
25 Darthmeister // Oct 27, 2008 at 7:17 pm
J. Cougar, how about the sex scandal of Democrat Mahoney who replaced Tom Foley? Shouldn’t that reflect on the whole Democratic Party and Obama like the way you think Tom Foley’s lude emails with two young men shining him on apparently reflects on the Republicans? There’s even audio documentation of the jerk Mahoney trying to ditch his mistress by firing her from her job!
And let’s not so quickly forget this Democrat’s relatively recent sex scandal. But then sex scandals in the Democratic Party typically prove to be resume enhancers don’t they?
More on Democrat double standards.
Mahoney’s sex scandal is kind of a nice way to kick off the 2009 Democratically-controlled Congress and the Barack Obama Administration - if he wins- don’t ya think, Couga baby?
Top Ten Democrat Sex Scandals. Please note, unlike the Republican Party, Democrats involved in sex scandals typically remain in Congress! More Democrat double-standards. Unlike the Democratic Party, the Republican Party at least has a conscience and understand that all members of Congress should be held to a higher standard given the power they wield … excepting Democrats, of course, they have their standards and won’t raise them for anyone!
26 RepublicanAttackMachine // Oct 27, 2008 at 7:45 pm
Abortion in America kills FAR MORE black babies than ANY other color! Wouldn’t you think blacks should then hate this genocide more than any other race?
Several GREAT Americans who agree with me are here:
http://www.kcfl.net/kcfl/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECTnBYQjDH8
27 MajorDomo // Oct 27, 2008 at 7:48 pm
In order to level the playing field, Obama would have to issue fetuses to lesbian couples so they can exercise their right to choose abortion.
28 MajorDomo // Oct 27, 2008 at 7:54 pm
So what was the bad word that needed moderation? Fetuses? Or abortion?
29 mindknumbed kid // Oct 27, 2008 at 8:30 pm
If you read (study) Saul Alinski’s works you will understand that BO is following his blueprint for “change”. And if that doesn’t bother you then the only thing that will is to elect people that will “stay the course” of capitalism.
I don’t care how much you loathe the current president, there is no excuse for destroying our entire form of government. The evidence of who Barack Obama is and what his agenda will be is overwhelming and becoming more and more obvious (unless you get your “news” from the lapdogs bobbing around in the Obamabowl), denying truth will never change it. Wean yourselves from huffpost and moveon, and look for some honest perspective.
30 mindknumbed kid // Oct 27, 2008 at 8:35 pm
Sometimes it is hard to imagine what you have said in a post that sends it into solitary confinement. Can be frustrating when you are passionate about what you wanted to say. But patience is a virtue they tell us, and in due time we shall be heard…
31 mindknumbed kid // Oct 27, 2008 at 9:12 pm
Is the effort to protect the unborn good, or is it bad?
I would ask that you ask yourself that question just as directly as it was put forth, and give yourself an honest answer out of good conscience.
Next do the same thing for this question: Is it good to provide aid and comfort to one that is injured, or is that bad?
Do you have your answers now?
When you have the answers, consider this statement:
Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.
It is between you and your conscience. Make your choices accordingly.
32 mindknumbed kid // Oct 27, 2008 at 9:16 pm
Might want to consider whether or not there is any kind of cause and effect there if everyone that consumes it is a lib…
33 debass // Oct 27, 2008 at 9:41 pm
I guess McCain’s 50+ years of experience don’t count. You forgot to list BO’s accomplishments. Oh, pardon me, you did list them. You also forgot to mention the 2+ million deaths in SE Asia as a result of O’biden’s voting record and the throwing away of 58,000 young American lives.
It’s always the “intellectuals” that put the mass murderers in power. Stalin called them useful idiots. There are too many similarities between this election and the 1932 German election.
Don’t worry. If BO is elected, it won’t be long before all women are forced to have abortions. That’s why Dhimms are for gov. funded abortion, their way of controlling the minority population. Margaret Sanger would be proud.
34 mindknumbed kid // Oct 27, 2008 at 9:48 pm
Isn’t it about time you started taking things a bit more seriously?
… it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
Consider also that
It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
35 Darthmeister // Oct 27, 2008 at 9:53 pm
With Senator Stevens’ conviction for not knowing how much contractors should be charging for the remodeling work, I wonder when William Jefferson (Democrat-Louisiana) will get his just reward for accepting an outright $100,000 bribe?
I guess it wouldn’t be wise to be holding my breath that long.
36 mindknumbed kid // Oct 27, 2008 at 9:57 pm
My answer to #11.
2 Timothy 3:6-8 (Mindknumbed Revised Version)
6For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,
7Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
8Now as Obama and Biden withstood Jesus, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith.
37 mindknumbed kid // Oct 27, 2008 at 10:02 pm
Free goods and services for Stevens = BAD.
Free (bribery) money for Jefferson = GOOD.
You just have to watch your D’s and R’s!
38 mindknumbed kid // Oct 27, 2008 at 10:38 pm
*’Twas the night before elections*
*And all through the town*
*Tempers were flaring*
*Emotions all up and down!*
**
*I, in my bathrobe*
*With a cat in my lap*
*Had cut off the TV*
*Tired of political crap.*
**
*When all of a sudden*
*There arose such a noise*
*I peered out of my window*
*Saw Obama and his boys*
**
*They had come for my wallet*
*They wanted my pay*
*To give to the others*
*Who had not worked a day!*
**
*He snatched up my money*
*And quick as a wink*
*Jumped back on his bandwagon*
*As I gagged from the stink*
**
*He then rallied his henchmen*
*Who were pulling his cart*
*I could tell they were out*
*To tear my country apart!*
**
*’ On Fannie, on Freddie, *
*On Biden and Ayers!*
*On Acorn, On Pelosi’*
*He screamed at the pairs!*
**
*They took off for his cause*
*And as he flew out of sight*
*I heard him laugh at the nation*
*Who wouldn’t stand up and fight!*
**
*So I leave you to think*
*On this one final note-*
*IF YOU DONT WANT SOCIALISM*
*GET OUT AND VOTE!!!!*
39 mindknumbed kid // Oct 27, 2008 at 10:39 pm
Good night Scrappletown!
40 BlackLion31U // Oct 27, 2008 at 11:43 pm
MNK,
Cougar said it best in #11: ..”Or is it really down to who would make the best pastor?”
The two do not and should not conflict. Your belief is your belief. This government should be accepting of your belief as well as the hundreds of others that have developed within the union,
and should allow your freedom to practice such as long as it does not infringe on the same rights of those who may believe differently than you. There should be no favor for any one. It is extremely important to keep church and state separate.
In the end, it is God and only God’s privilege to judge who is right and wrong. I do not believe that it is our job to do so.
41 BlackLion31U // Oct 27, 2008 at 11:45 pm
RAM,
How do you feel about capital punishment?
42 mindknumbed kid // Oct 28, 2008 at 5:49 am
Here then, let me say it better than JCM. This is about who would be the best leader for our governing, leave God in the church where he belongs. All we need is a King to lead of us!
Let’s keep religion in it’s place, far away from politics…well, for everyone with that view you couldn’t make a better choice than Mr. Obama.
43 mig // Oct 28, 2008 at 6:28 am
Just a little lite humor to start the day.
44 gafisher // Oct 28, 2008 at 6:35 am
Don’t count on that [#38], mkk. The Obama / Pelosi crowd have shown a willingness to subvert U.S. law to “cultural norms” in quite a few places. Sharia would not “… keep religion in it’s place, far away from politics.”
45 Darthmeister // Oct 28, 2008 at 7:03 am
If I may, here’s my two cents on the issue of capital punishment. Any one who supports the murder of the most innocent of humanity in the womb without case-by-case due process and then doesn’t support capital punishment in the case of a person found guilty of a heinous crime through due process by a jury of their peers is doubly whacked. No ifs, ands, or buts.
No system is perfect, but that doesn’t mean ultimate justice should be suspended in the cases of capital crimes any more than cars or alcohol should stop being manufactured because of drunk drivers killing innocent people. I will say this, if the forensics is not compelling and there is no reputable eyewitness to a capital crime, then the benefit of the doubt must always go to the defendant. It certainly hasn’t been that way in the past but given the state-of-the-art of DNA analysis and other forensic tools there is no reason why heinous murderers and child rapists shouldn’t suffer capital punishment. But then I suppose you’d go the extra mile for child rapists and heinous murderers, right Blacklion?
BTW, the principle of eye-for-an-eye in the Bible was a civilizing influence. Eye-for-an-eye is old speak for the more modern constitutional principle of “making the punishment fit the crime.” You can’t kill your neighbor’s child because he either accidentally or intentionally killed your goat.
Do you really believe in the great American principle of making the punishment fit the crime, Blacklion?
46 Fred Sinclair // Oct 28, 2008 at 7:14 am
The Nazi Party; The Communist Party; The Socialist Party (aka The DNC) The Sierra Club, Code Pink; Moveon.org etc. I would like a Constitutional Amendment making these outfits illegal. However as much as I would like it - it’ll never happen, since far too many moles in our Congress and various Government Agencies already belong to one or more of these Anti-American groups.
If Karl Marx had been told that in little over a century, America would be running for President, one of his most avid adherents. he would probably have smiled and said something like, “All things come to he who waits. America will become the greatest, most powerful Communist Nation in the history of our planet.”
However someone should have told him that when you begin giving away everything in the wagon to those who aren’t helping pull it, and you stop feeding the horse; the horse is going to stop pulling the wagon. The wagon will end up empty and everybody will become like N. Korea, N. Viet Nam. Cuba, etc.
Capitalism is based on rewards. You plant the seeds, tend the vines and reap the harvest. Socialism confiscates your harvest to distribute to others (after skimming their vigorish off of the top). At which time you will cease planting seeds and tending vines.
For all of the uncountable times Socialism has been tried there is not one example of it ever working (except for short periods by use of force a/k/a “The Police State”) Why will almost half of America believe that Obama will be the sole exception? A Marxist down through his tap root. Cuba and Venezuela we are not. But then Cuba and Venezuela didn’t think they were either, until it was too late.
Thomas Edison had 1,093 patents. He didn’t invent things (light bulb, phonograph, etc.) for the betterment of mankind. He insured that his horse would be fed, and well fed at that, bwo his patents. People wanted his products - and they paid, and paid, and paid. A mega-multimillionaire when he died, but if the Government had nationalized his patents (for the common good, of course - from each according to his ability…..) he would have stopped at two or three patents and the entire world would be a far different place.
47 Fred Sinclair // Oct 28, 2008 at 7:15 am
48 onlineanalyst // Oct 28, 2008 at 7:20 am
In case you have never heard this interview of Yuri Bezmenov, give a listen. He speaks from bitter experience about life under Communist regimes. Useful idiots are the first to be sacrificed because they know too much.
Also, Obama’s code of “redistribution” of wealth is Gramscian, a more insidious form, for it lulls the dissatisfied into thinking that they will live in an economic utopia. (Let me check on the spelling of that name, just to be certain, so that you can explore a little for yourself.)
Obama never expresses his political vision in terms of individuality, liberty, and American exceptionalism, In insisting on equality of outcome rather than opportunity, he perverts the intent of our Founding Fathers and the documents so vital to our nation’s uniqueness.
Re the education credentials trotted out for comparison/contrast: When a presidential candidate like Obama has not exposed his transcripts and other curriculum vitae to sunshine and when his Veep has a history of plagiarism as part of his scholarship and government service, I will concede the point. Otherwise, I prefer to value more a working history of accomplishments.
49 onlineanalyst // Oct 28, 2008 at 7:29 am
Here is something to mull over with your morning coffee. The commentary explains the more subtle Gramscian Marxism and its role in cultural warfare.
Gramsci’s political philosophy shapes the principles of Obama, his buddy Ayers, and a number of their fellow-traveling acolytes.
50 Hawkeye // Oct 28, 2008 at 7:37 am
OLA,
Try re-posting the link about “this interview of Yuri Bezmenov”.
51 Hawkeye // Oct 28, 2008 at 7:39 am
Mig #44,
Thanks for the smile
wv = maiden-hair Harry — meets “stretch” Pelosi.
52 Fred Sinclair // Oct 28, 2008 at 7:58 am
The bottom line is that God is in charge. All too often, that is overlooked. He will put in the Presidency, whoever He chooses. I don’t think you should throw away your umbrella (Bumbershoot in England) and walk bareheaded through the rain, because it must be God’s will for you to get drenched. No He gave man a brain to work and invent the umbrella so you won’t get wet, while He’s watering the earth.
He also gave us brains so we can resist the devil, He even equipped us, His warriors with His Armor, for - fighting evil (a/k/a “The Absence of God”) by denouncing and fighting the devil’s minions wherever they arise.
Barack Hussein Obama promotes, supports and stands for everything relating to The Absence of God, with absolutely no regard whatsoever to his protestations about Islam and Christianity (just words), his only religion is Obamanism: from abortion and homosexuality to dishonoring his own grandmother. (the 5th commandment holds no meaning to him).
Socialism is evil and has no place in America’s politics. Unless we in our complacency just stand there like a deer in the headlights waiting for the truck to run over us.
53 Fred Sinclair // Oct 28, 2008 at 7:59 am
push
54 Darthmeister // Oct 28, 2008 at 8:01 am
Just to make the point again: Obamessiah the same today, yesterday, yea forever! (My apologies to the Bible)
Any person who doesn’t have their head buried in partisan sand knows Obamessiah is a neo-Marxist redistributionist. His unguarded comment to Joe the Plumber (which brought down hellfire and brimstone from Obmessiah’s brownshirts who trashed Joe the Plumber for his impudence in publicly embarassing The One) about how he (Oblahblah) wanted to “spread the wealth around” is no different than his views in 2001, caught on tape here.
Obambi may not be a card carrying member of the American communist party, but any collectivist/redistributionist is a Marxist at heart. It’s been truthfully claimed that His Highness voted 96% of the time with his party in the most corrupt political Democratic machine in the nation here in the People’s Republic of Illinois. This means his default mode will be trying to export the failed political experiment we had in this state to the rest of the nation.
Now, much has been made by Obamessiah’s brown shirts that McCain allegedly voted “90% of the time in support of President Bush”, therefore he IS President Bush. I think the number is actually closer to 82% and the dirty little secret is there are moderate and conservative Democrats who voted a higher percentage in support of President Bush’s agenda.
But the sheer hate of Obama supporters compel them to equate McCain with the dreaded Bu$Hitler of their fantasies while at the same time overlooking the obvious fact that Barry The Messiah is about as left-wing one can get in America … excepting for a few million absolute nutcases like Bill Ayers who are committed commies (his own admission to being a “little ‘c’ communist”) seeking to undermine this nation by hook, crook, pipebombs or brainwashing our children a la the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, for example.
Sheer hatred on the part of any political party, in this case the Democratic Party, has never, ever achieved national unity. Their Obamessiah may prove to not only be the most incompetent and inexperienced President this nation has ever seen but also the most divisive and dangerous one. Yet his supporters, fueled by their utterly blind hatred for nearly half the Americans in this country, will put this guy in power to essentially teach America a lesson.
And they already have their course of action figured out which justifies the outcome of their venomous hatred. When their Obamessiah proves to be a disappointment on the home front as well as during a very real international crisis which is sure to crop up (thank you Joe “Plugsy” Biden), it will always be “Bush’s fault.” For the next four or eight years America will always be told Bush so fouled up the economy (which is in far better shape than the economy under Jimmy Carter) that not even messiah can fix it. Of course this is pure bunk since Ronaldus Magnus fixed Jimmy Carter’s economy in a couple of years - if Presidents really do set the national tone and have that kind of influence over financial markets and economies.
A second excuse they’ll use when Obamessiah disappoints them by more flip-flopping during his administration, we forced them to vote for Obama! That is, if Republicans and conservatives hadn’t been so “evil” they wouldn’t have been forced to vote for their Emperor who has no clothes. So it’s not really their fault … it’s OUR fault! Typical libtard logic, of course. We’ll hear stuff like, “If McCain hadn’t been so much like President Buffoon, I would have voted for him instead.”
Third, despite how much Obamessiah may deepen the recession/economy over the next four to six years, his acolytes with claim, “It would have been worse under McCain.” Yeah, right. Of course they can always BLAME BUSH (see #1).
These rationalizations will probably be the only means by which they can keep their dignity and sanity for having voted the most glib, unaccomplished, inexperienced partisan neo-Marxist this nation had as a presidential candidate into the White House.
55 onlineanalyst // Oct 28, 2008 at 8:16 am
See if this link works re the interview with Yuri Bezmenov: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x32cxf_yuri-bezmenov
56 Fred Sinclair // Oct 28, 2008 at 8:33 am
dogpile or google: obama’s use of subliminal hypnosis in his speeches
A short excerpt:
Proving Barack Obama’s use of a little-known and highly deceptive and manipulative form of “hack†hypnosis on millions of unaware Americans, and reveals what only a few psychologists and hypnosis/NLP experts know.
Barack Obama’s speeches contain the hypnosis techniques of Dr. Milton Erickson, M.D. who developed a form of “conversational†hypnosis that could be hidden in seemingly normal speech and used on patients without their knowledge for therapy purposes.
Obama’s techniques are the height of deception and psychological manipulation, remaining hidden because one must understand the science behind the language patterns in order to spot them. This document
examines Obama’s speeches word by word, hand gesture by hand gesture, tone, pauses, body language, and
proves his use of covert hypnosis intended only for licensed therapists on consenting patients. Obama’s
mesmerized, cult-like, grade-school-crush-like worship by millions is not because “Obama is the greatest
leader of a generation†who simply hasn’t accomplished anything, who magically “inspires†by giving
speeches. Obama is committing perhaps the biggest fraud and deception in American history.
Obama is not just using subliminal messages, but textbook covert hypnosis and neuro-linguistic programming techniques on audiences that are intentionally designed to sideline rational judgment and implant subconscious commands to think he is wonderful and elect him President.
57 J. Cougar Melancholy // Oct 28, 2008 at 8:36 am
We all know from the last eight years that a “religious” President can’t lead for diddly.
But I believe McKane is Abel.
heh heh.
58 BlackLion31U // Oct 28, 2008 at 9:38 am
JL3 #22
I appreciate the sarcastic response. I am well aware that George W. Bush is not running AGAIN, thank God. Your true answer to that question I believe would lay doubt to your judgment.
Darthmeister #46,
I would just like to make sure I understand your response correctly (no sarcasm).
(Darth)”Any one who supports the murder of the most innocent of humanity in the womb without case-by-case due process…â€
(BL31U) I am assuming you do not support this?
(Darth) “…and then doesn’t support capital punishment in the case of a person found guilty of a heinous crime through due process by a jury of their peers is doubly whacked. No ifs, ands, or buts.”
((BL31U) I am assuming you do support this?
What you wrote appears to say; if you are against abortion, then you should be against capital punishment, and that if you are for abortion then you should be for capital punishment.
Is that correct?
59 JamesonLewis3rd // Oct 28, 2008 at 10:14 am
I was not being sarcastic.
60 BlackLion31U // Oct 28, 2008 at 12:16 pm
JL3,
Then answer the question. Do you believe that George W. Bush is a “faux” Republican?
61 mig // Oct 28, 2008 at 7:44 pm
The first 6 yrs. of Bushs’ term were economically fine, the last 2 years is when things started to tank. Hmm what happened? Oh I remember, the dummocrats took over Congress, that’s where they make the laws that we have to live by.
Don’t cha just wish we could have the same retirement accounts that Biden has and all the rest of his congressional cohorts? Bush tried. But the outrage!
Oh and Obama lies, 3000 un-born children a day die.
Here’s another thought. Congress imposed term limits on the President, (but not themselves) do you think they could revoke it and let Obama remain in the White House indefinitely? Do you think that he’ll repaint it Red?
I heard on our local radio that if Obama is elected into the White House, this will be our last free election.
Here comes the misery index again.
“The public cannot be too curious concerning the characters of public men.” —Samuel Adams
62 mindknumbed kid // Oct 28, 2008 at 8:51 pm
You never know how and when God will judge, but rest assured that in His time, it will happen. God has a history of using the heathen Kings of other nations to bring judgment to his people, but who is to say that in the future it will not be one of “our own”?
63 Grogg // Oct 28, 2008 at 10:28 pm
J. Cougar Melancholy // Oct 27, 2008 at 1:24 pm post 11
The superior credentials of the democratic contenders may not matter to the illiterate (or at least, those that do not understand Latin).
mindknumbed kid // Oct 27, 2008 at 8:35 pm post 39-40
Being heard is no value
Unless you they do
And you take the time
To ensure your words rhyme
Fred Sinclair // Oct 28, 2008 at 7:58 am post 53.
Why invoke the name of God - which (as we all know) “defies human understanding” to make an argument that the Marquis de Sade used against the bourgeoisie (top 1% of the wealth). The interesting reversal is that the Marquis was a magistrate (and a member of the bourgeoisie). His (MdS) was a fervent supporter of the Revolution (because if its blatant unfairness) - that fact was accepted by the Revolutionists who saw his their ally and spared him an appointment with Madam Guillotine.
Another difference is that his (MdS) writings were based on logic: and not logical argument followed by unsubstantiated, unrelated statements.
Are there only a handful of writers who took Debating 101?
Peace
Grogg
You must log in to post a comment.