ScrappleFace: News Fairly Unbalanced. We Report. You Decipher




Top Stories...




Census: Whites in Minority by 2042, Ready to Cash In

by Scott Ott for ScrappleFace · 40 Comments

(2008-08-14) — According to the latest U.S. Census data, in little more than a generation minorities will become the majority, thus enabling White Americans to ‘get on the receiving end’ of government cash, jobs and other benefits which they can’t get now because of their unfortunate racial status.

Good jobs without full qualification, contractor set-asides on government projects, easier access to college, and more personal attention from Democrat candidates are among the special favors that Whites can expect to receive starting in the year 2042, experts said.

However, being in the minority may also have its pitfalls. So, in preparation for the transition, White activists have already formed several organizations to promote fair treatment and to protect civil rights.

The National Association for the Advancement of Pale People (known as the N-Double-A P.P.) has already filed incorporation papers, as has a counterpart to the Rev. Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition, currently dubbed The Beige Coalition.

In Washington D.C., visionary lawmakers have begun to draft an agenda for the Congressional White Caucus which will represent the interests of their minority children and grandchildren, making sure, for example, that suburban public school districts get their fair share of federal education funding.

Meanwhile, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said it will be ready to defend the rights of White people, to stem the outbreak of police citations for D.W.W. (driving while white), and to fight for things like guaranteed access to government documents written in English.

However, an ACLU source acknowledged that “re-tooling for the new era of fighting discrimination against Whites may have to await the retirement of everyone currently on staff.”

Your Donation Fuels Family-Friendly Satire


Bonus Quick-Hit Satire: Follow ScrappleFace on Twitter
Print This Story Print This Story |  RSS Feed

Related Stories...

FREE ScrappleFace Email Updates
Get free instant notice when new story posted. Emails contain unsubscribe link. Cancel anytime.

Tags: Culture · U.S. News

40 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Mack // Aug 14, 2008 at 8:49 am

    Scott, you hit this clear out of the park. even my sweet liberal aunt will catch the clarity of this.

  • 2 Mack // Aug 14, 2008 at 9:14 am

    Oh the joy of it. Get up early. Pick a fight with the trolls. Drink some coffee.

    It’s going to be a great day.

  • 3 JamesonLewis3rd // Aug 14, 2008 at 9:33 am

    Yes!
    :shock:
    Politically Correct” will be redefined! Speak English. Worship Almighty God. Love your spouse and children. Be modest. Utopia!!!!! tra-la

  • 4 Ms RightWing, Ink // Aug 14, 2008 at 9:35 am

    Good morning Mack

    Scott, now that was funny. One of your best that I can remember. I’m sure the Scrapplers will have fun with this post.

    Also thank you for your Twitter explanation on the last post. I will take a deep breath and re-examine the technology.

    I’m still trying to work on bringing live sound to the stories at the Cafe so people can hear the stories, therefore all the high tech stuff is still on the high shelf of my MS battered brain. I can’t reach it from here without a ladder.

  • 5 Ms RightWing, Ink // Aug 14, 2008 at 9:43 am

    Will the new majority try to force the citizens to pay reparations to us new minorities.

    Excessive political authority of the Swedish Lutheran Government forced my grandparents to flee to America in order to find peaceful place in Iowa to raise pigs.

    I’m not sure why my mother’s side fled Ireland but I’m sure it had to do with potatoes. After arriving here they had to suffer the indignity of moving to Kentucky.

    Likely I will not be here in 2040, but make sure my third, fourth and perhaps fifth generation will get there money.

  • 6 Maggie // Aug 14, 2008 at 9:49 am

    So you’re just sayin’ ……white is the new black?

    OT
    Thanks scrapplers for all the good words on the Obama for VP thread.

    Is anyone else having dificulty retrieving your yahoo email? I am unable to get past the home page.

  • 7 boberinyetagain // Aug 14, 2008 at 9:58 am

    Say it isn’t so…a melting pot? Who’d have thunk it? Where will they build the fence to keep out the white folks? The mind reels…

  • 8 BlackLion31U // Aug 14, 2008 at 10:15 am

    Fred,

    “….Our founders should have included “too stupid” and “too inexperienced”

    I guess they reasoned that Americans in the future could figure that out for themselves and if not would rightly deserve a stupid inexperienced President…”

    Hey, everybody here who voted for George “W” twice, raise your hand.

  • 9 boberinyetagain // Aug 14, 2008 at 10:18 am

    Duh! The fence will likley need to be along the Canadian border. That’s going to be expensive!

  • 10 boberinyetagain // Aug 14, 2008 at 10:19 am

    You do not have permission to access this server.

    Your technical support key is: 41ca-04a2-dfd9-b1ad

  • 11 Mack // Aug 14, 2008 at 10:20 am

    People are people. You take them one at a time. To quote Kilrane from the movie Gettysburg, “Anyone one who judges by the group is a pea wit.”

    In our PC world people are accorded virtue because of their skin color or nationality. Perhaps this does not speak well of the vegans. Pea wit. My phrase of the day.

  • 12 mig // Aug 14, 2008 at 10:44 am

    I live to start checking boxes on applications. So far I am a write in candidate for the greeks.

  • 13 gafisher // Aug 14, 2008 at 10:46 am

    Don’t kid yourself; the day the “minorities” become the majority, our enlightened legislators will suddenly and finally see the wisdom of Dr. Martin Luther King and end discriminatory Affirmative Action.

    And that would be fine with me.

    (Related story: ostensibly to ensure compliance with my state’s new ban on race- and gender-based preference programs, one of our big cities is considering a policy which stipulates that “Any company that does business with the city will be required to report how many minorities, women, veterans, people with disabilities, and city residents are on its payroll.” That ought to clean up the preference-program mess once and for all …)

  • 14 nylecoj // Aug 14, 2008 at 11:34 am

    Maggie re #6 “white is the new black” I love it.
    boberin re # 10 I get that about every other time.

    Excellent article Scott, I concur with Ms RW in #5

  • 15 nylecoj // Aug 14, 2008 at 11:35 am

    in the tooting my own horn category, I have given another try to getting my blog going. Nothing exciting but I am out there.

  • 16 NevadaPundit // Aug 14, 2008 at 11:45 am

    I totally agree gafisher, and for once all the people of the U.S. who are created equal will actually be equal.

  • 17 RedPepper // Aug 14, 2008 at 1:11 pm

    Hello there, Mack! Where u bin hidin’ ?

    Re #2: Looking for fights in all the wrong places? The trolls you’re apt to find here aren’t worth the effort; nor would I call being on the receiving end of IEDs and shoulder-fired rockets a “fight” worth having …

    Re #11: Visualize whirled peas …

  • 18 JamesonLewis3rd // Aug 14, 2008 at 1:18 pm

    I feel like I’ve stepped through a Time Warp as I read the headlines in Pravda these days. I wonder if there is a Gulag-Building Boom going on in Siberia for all of us Capitalist Pigs.
    [cut to video, on an ancient 600lb console TV with a 14" screen and 600W per 14" speaker, of Nikita pounding his desk with his stinking shoe]

  • 19 everthink // Aug 14, 2008 at 1:32 pm

    “After arriving here they had to suffer the indignity of moving to Kentucky.”

    Any indignity suffered was all Kentucky’s.

    Welcome to America!

    ET

  • 20 Mack // Aug 14, 2008 at 1:33 pm

    Hi Red

    I’ve got a new job and that keeps me in the field a lot. Otherwise we are expecting and so far so good. Thank you for asking.

    As for the trolls, I was showing my niece how foolish they sound. So far none have come up off the bottom to chase the bait.

  • 21 RedPepper // Aug 14, 2008 at 1:40 pm

    boberin: how r things in the Keystone State ? Up here, it’s been so wet that mold is taking over!

    Re #s 7,9: No, no, that would be the fence to keep the whites in

    Re # 10: Aren’t computers FUN ? ! ?

  • 22 Fred Sinclair // Aug 14, 2008 at 1:43 pm

    JL3rd #53 (prior thread)

    I’m a member of “the Reformed Baptist Church of Holland” and I too believe in the infallibility of God’s Word.

    I lived on the Island of Crete for a year and a half during which time I learned to speak Greek. Today’s Modern Greek differs from the Ancient Greek as today’s Americaneese differs from the English of King James day. ie: Bumbershoot = Umbrella; Perambulator = Baby buggy.

    In Greek the word kukla = doll and mu on the end of any word is possessive = mine. So the word kuklamu should be translated “My Doll” and yet although accurate it’s also wrong. The only word in English that semantically corresponds to kuklamu is the expression “Baby Doll” a term of endearment between spouses or descriptive of a certain style of pajamas.

    Going back to Ancient Greek the verse “Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law”. (KJV) Rom. 13:8

    The verse should correctly be translated “Owe no man any thing, but to love one another [of the same kind]: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law”. Meaning that my love for you as a brother in Christ is far more personal than my generic love and compassion for “mankind in general”.

    The same is true when Jesus said “By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another. [of the same kind] (John 13:35)

    So following God’s Word should involve the writers meaning as well as the printed word on paper. A good example is 2Cor. 9:7 Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver. - more accurately translated [a hilarious giver]

    There is a currently available translation called “The Message” which, going back to the oldest known manuscripts has been transliterated into today’s “street language”. It follows the conversations of the time far more accurately than the flowing beauty of King James English. Although I continue to use John MacArthur’s study Bible in the “New King James” translation for all my study.

    I have eighteen different translations of the Bible and “The Message” is my #1 favorite.

    IN GOD WE TRUST

  • 23 RedPepper // Aug 14, 2008 at 1:47 pm

    Mack #20: I suggest you take your niece to the nearest zoo, & visit the monkeys. Almost as amusing as the trolls, and the only thing they are likely to try to pelt you with are their own feces …

    /another similarity to trolls, come to think of it …

  • 24 everthink // Aug 14, 2008 at 1:58 pm

    Mack,

    “People are people. You take them one at a time. To quote Kilrane from the movie Gettysburg, “Anyone one who judges by the group is a pea wit.””

    I like your point!

    How about this one:
    “I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.” Martin Luther King, Jr.’s speech “The I Have a Dream”

    ET

  • 25 everthink // Aug 14, 2008 at 2:17 pm

    Yo bober,

    Nice to see you!

    ET

  • 26 everthink // Aug 14, 2008 at 2:25 pm

    Mack,

    Last thread, some little “Chickenhawk” said:

    “I’m tempted to think that we should move our troops from Iraq to Georgia—that’s how serious this looks to me.”

    What do you think?

    ET

  • 27 Mack // Aug 14, 2008 at 2:27 pm

    Dr. King was more eloquent Neverthink, but it says the same thing. Read the whole speech. Dr. King saw a day when people were judged by the content of their character not the color of their skin. Liberals today want to give virtue to people for the color of their skin and ignore the character, making excuses for people like Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Bill Clinton, and the new and improved John Edwards.

    Dr. King would not condone Affirmative Action any more than the NAACP would endorse a Klan candidate/ Oh wait, they did when the endorsed Senator Byrd.

  • 28 Mack // Aug 14, 2008 at 2:28 pm

    I think invading Georgi would be a logistics nightmare.

  • 29 BlackLion31U // Aug 14, 2008 at 2:48 pm

    Mack,

    We should all hope for a day when people are judged by the content of their character. That being said, shouldn’t Sen. John McCain be grouped with Bill Clinton, and the new and improved John Edwards?

  • 30 RedRum151 // Aug 14, 2008 at 2:54 pm

    Right. Obama is the “post-racial” candidate, and if you dare to criticize him in any way, you are - a racist !

    “I have a dream that the day will come when my children will be judged not on the color of their skin but on the content of their character.”

    - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. : Washington, D. C. , August 28, 1963

    I could not better explain than Dr. King does right there, why I will never cast a vote for Barack Obama .

  • 31 everthink // Aug 14, 2008 at 3:00 pm

    Mack,

    “People are people. You take them one at a time. To quote Kilrane from the movie Gettysburg, “Anyone one who judges by the group is a pea wit.””

    Maybe, it would be best if you were to apply that same idea to Democrats. It is likely we disagree on less than it may seem, and our individual disagreements may be only in application and degree. Because of this we seek different solutions.

    “… making excuses for people like Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Bill Clinton, and the new and improved John Edwards. ”

    It depends on what is being excused. I can’t remember Al Sharpton ever saying anything I agreed with, from time to time I have thought Jesse Jackson had a point, but not for a long time.

    George Bush makes Bill Clinton look like George Washington AS PRESIDENT, I am ashamed of his personal sin, as I am John Edwards’.

    Such failing is in the carnal nature of all men.

    “Let him who is without sin cast the first stone”.

    I have known more than one Baptist Pastor, and I have read of many Republicans, including John McCain to have the same failing.

    In the end there is only One Judge of all men.

    ET

    wv = Panic Moronvilliers ~ Pass!

  • 32 everthink // Aug 14, 2008 at 3:15 pm

    Mack,

    On your last point:

    Dr. King would not condone Affirmative Action any more than the NAACP would endorse a Klan candidate/ Oh wait, they did when the endorsed Senator Byrd.

    I believe Affirmative Action is REVERSE DISCRIMINATION!!

    The NAACP forgave Senator Byrd! A Christ-like act!

    ET

  • 33 da Bunny // Aug 14, 2008 at 3:16 pm

    “Census: Whites in Minority by 2042, Ready to Cash In”

    Starting my “to do” list now:

    -Brush up on “victimspeak” terminology;
    -Be incessantly angry simply because of my race, ethnicity, skin color, etc.;
    -Develop a rampant paranoia that people of other races, ethnicity, skin color, etc. are “against” me, simply because of the way we each appear;
    -Learn how to demand AND expect handouts;
    -Be antisocial;
    -Refuse to assimilate;
    -Learn the most effective “protesting” tactics;
    -Learn how to threaten violence when things don’t go my way…

    I think I’ve got a good start on how to handle being a “minority,” but there’s so much more to add to this list. Of that, I’m certain.

  • 34 everthink // Aug 14, 2008 at 3:21 pm

    RedRum151,

    The only thing you know of Barack Obama’s character you learned from liars paid to “inform” you!

    ET

  • 35 everthink // Aug 14, 2008 at 3:56 pm

    Mack,

    I have to leave now. My guess is that your niece was benefited by our brief exchange. Even if only to reveal my foolishness.

    It is her world we now make, let us do it wisely.

    ET

  • 36 Mack // Aug 14, 2008 at 5:24 pm

    I don’t havea problem with democrats, just liberals. Liberals who support the ACLU for instance which wants to bar the free practice of religion. Liberals who support and defend infanticide for profit in the practice of abortion. Liberals who want to redistribute the wealth of the working class to take care of and thus enslave the non-working people.

    Those liberals I have a problem with. Like wise with the people who defend terrorists and attact the president who is sworn to protect and defend them, even if they are liberals. In other words I don’t care for fools who codle the people who would kill them and attact the people who are trying to protect them.

    Frankly I never defended anyone for sleeping around on their spouse. Not anyone for their is no defense for it.

    I don’t care for the wacko enviromentalists who have shut down our ability to produce our own oil with years of restrictions only to enslave us to middle east despots. Frankly I don’t care for people who defy logic and obstruct others when they try to fix problems. In other words, liberals.

  • 37 Darthmeister // Aug 14, 2008 at 5:51 pm

    In 2042 when we get a real taste of the “multicultural” velvet gulag behind the left’s Robin Hood mask, ya think there might be an Affirmative Reaction program?

    And when these pointy little heads say “whites”, are they talking about Jewish “whites”, German “whites”, Irish “whites”, Saxon “whites”, Spanish “whites”, Anglo “whites”, Italian “whites”, Russian “whites”, etc. ? Kind of hard telling us apart since whiteys all look alike, right?

    From an “ethnic” POV most of the “whites” in America already belong to a minority.

  • 38 everthink // Aug 14, 2008 at 6:12 pm

    Mack,

    “ACLU Comes to Rush Limbaugh’s Defense
    January 12, 2004 by Catherine Donaldson-Evans, FOX NEWS

    The ACLU contends that state law enforcement officers violated Limbaugh’s privacy rights by taking possession of his medical records as part of their criminal investigation into the commentator’s alleged “doctor-shopping” to feed his prescription-drug addiction.

    While this case involves the right of Rush Limbaugh to maintain the privacy of his medical records, the precedent set in this case will impact the security of medical records and the privacy of the doctor-patient relationship of every person in Florida,” Simon said in his statement.

    The motion, filed with the Fourth District Court of Appeal claims the state encroached upon the Florida constitution’s right to privacy when law enforcement officials confiscated Limbaugh’s medical files.

    The ACLU said it was trying to “to vindicate every Floridian’s fundamental right to privacy by ensuring that the state be required to comply” with the law.”

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108140,00.html

    You do seem to have a point about the ACLU!

    ET

  • 39 everthink // Aug 14, 2008 at 6:39 pm

    The United States Constitution

    Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

    You religious rights, and mine, are guaranteed by law. These rights must be applied equally to all to be just.

    Those that believe they must howl at the moon in the worship of their god have that right, unless they disturb my peace, or interfere with my rights.

    ET

  • 40 Mack // Aug 16, 2008 at 2:44 am

    Freedom of religion is not freedom from religion. Just so you know, god wins in the end. Those who oppose Him will be judged by Him.

You must log in to post a comment.