Scott Ott, editor of ScrappleFace.com and anchor of SNN, will appear with Steve Green of VodkaPundit on today’s live PJTV coverage of the presidential inauguration at approximately 2:15 p.m. (Eastern).
Mr. Ott and Mr. Green also appeared yesterday to discuss the coming event and that segment is available as well.
PJTV is a web-based subscription video news and opinion service providing a rare platform for conservative viewpoints. Scott Ott appears, on average, twice each week, usually on the Blogger Roundtable segment.
52 responses so far ↓
1 BlackLion31U // Jan 20, 2009 at 12:23 pm
2:15 p.m. ? It’ll be done by then. C’mon Scott, they aren’t giving you the important anchor jobs yet?
By the way HAPPY BIRTHDAY EVERYONE!!!
2 gafisher // Jan 20, 2009 at 1:53 pm
Scott, thanks to you and PJTV for avoiding the temptation to review the Obama Presidency during the initial “honeymoon” period. By 2:15 we ought to have had time to develop some history in terms of sea levels dropping, the lame walking and the blind, especially his supporters, learning to see.
I look forward to the show, which I understand has been tentatively titled “Obama — 135 Minutes Which Shook The World.”
3 conserve-a-tip // Jan 20, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Scott, I am looking forward to your report, as I didn’t watch anything. I turned on the TV and it said that the upcoming show was “As My Stomach Churns” and I decided to honor my 20 year pact not to watch another soap opera. I’ll just wait for your humorous synopsis.
4 J. Cougar Melancholy // Jan 20, 2009 at 4:52 pm
Mmm, the wine fermented from your sour grapes tastes sweeter than I thought!
Blinky Bin Bush is about to land in the killing fields of Texas where he can get “Fishin’ Accomplished”.
“I believe history will be kind to this administration”
-Cheney-
Which textbook publishing house should we burn down first, Scrapplers?
Wake up and smell the stem cells!
5 Darthmeister // Jan 20, 2009 at 7:15 pm
To treat Barack Hussein Obama fairly (as liberals have defined the term by their actions the last seven years), he should be treated with precisely the same disrespect, lack of charity, lack of benefit of the doubt, and questioning of motives the liberals recklessly engaged in with respect to President Bush. The one difference being, unlike liberal Donks conservatives won’t have to subject Mr. Obama to moonbat conspiracy theories or baseless calumnies - the unvarnished truth will suffice.
Oh, btw, the allegedly smartest and most articulate man to occupy the Presidency totally flubbed and massacred the oath of office. If this is any indication of how he’ll discharge his duties as the empty suit that he is, Amerika is in for some troubling times.
Can you imagine the howls of laughter and months of derision the whackjobs on the left would engage in if George W. had done the same thing to the oath of office? But don’t worry, the national socialist media will drop this one like a hot potato so the left won’t have to trouble itself with the very public foibles of The One.
6 Darthmeister // Jan 20, 2009 at 7:47 pm
Battered Liberal Syndrome? Buwhahahaha! You can’t make this stuff up … but the kook Robert Shrum shamelessly manages to do so!
Read the comment section. The vast majority of posters get it right … liberals are perpetual victims and Shrum loses his argument in the first sentence with the utter bilge that “Bush stole the 2000 elections.”
7 Left Coast-Right Mind // Jan 20, 2009 at 10:10 pm
Darthmeister
Re: #6
I prefer my liberals battered, then deep fried in oil, chock full of trans-fats and a side of shoestring fries and an ice-cold brew. Maybe some coleslaw too. Hush puppies would work in a pinch as well.
8 Darthmeister // Jan 21, 2009 at 9:54 am
LC-RM, I personally find battered liberals too fattening and the incessant whining noise they make as they fry in
Criscoâ„¢the crucible of reality gets rather annoying. Ruins the whole life experience, ya know.Well, it looks like the Obamarx Administration is making good on its promise of more change:
U.S. Stocks Slide in Dow Average’s Worst Inauguration Day Drop
I fear this is just the tip of the iceberg that no amount of global warming is going to be able to melt.
BTW, the libtard national socialist media outlets are only playing the last half of Obamarx’s oath of office. My question is this, as badly as he mangled the oath is it tantamount to him having his fingers crossed behind is back? Just asking.
9 gafisher // Jan 21, 2009 at 12:09 pm
Darth Re posters getting it right: two excellent examples are [here] and [here].
10 gafisher // Jan 21, 2009 at 12:25 pm
Re#5: “[Obama] should be treated with precisely the same disrespect, lack of charity, lack of benefit of the doubt, and questioning of motives the liberals recklessly engaged in with respect to President Bush.”
I have to disagree. One of the many great things our last real President accomplished was to clearly identify “the soft bigotry of low expectations,” the besetting sin of the Democrat / liberal elite. However, Republicans and conservatives have long engaged in what may be an even more insidious form of prejudice, that of expecting liberals to act like reasoning adults even in the face of undeniable evidence to the contrary.
Adults don’t mock children who misbehave; rather, while recognizing their limited faculties we must encourage them to “put away childish things” and help them, to whatever extent we and they are able, toward responsible and mature behavior. That some learn slowly and some not at all is unfortunate, but no excuse for abandoning them, and certainly not for mimicking their immature misbehavior.
11 Just Ranting // Jan 21, 2009 at 12:48 pm
Gotta say I was unimpressed with his innaugural speech. His calls for unity fell hollow as he suggested that he is inheriting an unprecedented disaster which only he will be able to fix. It seems as a member on the Senate he might have taken some pre-emptive steps already to fix the problems; lack of financial oversight ( a congressional pervue) was in their control and was ignored except by Republicans who warned Fannie and Freddie would collapse. He is in a position where he will no longer be able to vote “present”. Rhetoric will need to be fleshed by policy. I fear he may replace Jimmy Carter as the worst president in my lifetime.
12 Just Ranting // Jan 21, 2009 at 12:57 pm
BTW, who are the near-sighted pundits who proclaim this the worst economy since the Great Depression. I lived through the 70s with odd/even gas lines, double digit mortgage rates, and near double digit umemployment. Jimmy Carter is without question the worst president of the last century. He lacked vision and saw America in decline, “malaise” was his term. It took the dynamism and vision of Reagan to bring us out of those dark days with his unbridled optimism and sound economic policies.
God bless Geo. W Bush. He kept us safe since 9-11-01. I didn’t always agree with him, but he made his decisions based on sound reasoning and prayerful council, not on the sways of the daily polls. May his remaining days be filled with peace.
13 gafisher // Jan 21, 2009 at 2:47 pm
Well said Just Ranting Re#12. Jimmy Catarrh was a stunningly incompetent executive, even for a Democrat. In a weird way the Catarrh years offer a degree of hope by demonstrating the depths from which the United States can recover.
Unfortunately, in a few years the Catarrh economy may seem like a hopelessly optimistic goal …
14 RepublicanAttackMachine // Jan 21, 2009 at 2:56 pm
I posted this on the last thread, BEFORE I knew there was a new thread. I really feel the hypocrite trolls need to see it. Maybe, (just maybe), they will have enough intelligence left to see what others do about the inane rhetoric they speak?
I would like to say that libs, (the trolls here), are simple hypocrites, but when they say something of this monumental stupidity, (statement is forthcoming). then they are simply the brain-dead, mind controlled lemmings, that we now see MOST, of the dimocratic party has become!
Are you ready for the libs new mantra that I heard a dozen times yesterday?
Here it is, “Obama is president now, so GET OVER IT!â€
I guess people with itsey bitsey, puny brains, destroyed by too much alcohol and drugs don’t realize, (as evidenced by the above troll posts), that they are telling us to do something that after 8 years, they CANNOT do themselves!
Their non-â€annointed†new leader will be a carbon copy of them, or vise-versa!
I would say to you brain dead libs, get ready for non stop bashing of this faux administration, every time they mess up, (which will be often), because we, (or at least I), will not forget the foul, vile things you have, (and continue to say), against a decent man, even if he did make some errors.
I ask GOD to help me NOT make it personal, (as the filthy left did/does, and on display here with the lib trolls), but I WILL take GREAT pleasure in pointing out EVERY misstep Obama and the lib Congress makes that hurts America during his hopefully short tenure!
Here’s to the first LEGITIMATE black President, Condolezza Rice!
15 Darthmeister // Jan 21, 2009 at 3:58 pm
The Media Lied, People Died
Whatever partisan spin the barking moonbats want to put on reality, Kengor gets the historical timeline absolutely correct about the media and their reporting of WMD in Iraq before Bush even became President. It’s another liberal myth that the media was heavily influenced by President Bush’s alleged propaganda war.
As we’ve noted here before, while George W. Bush was Governor of Texas, the American intelligence community, the Clinton Administration, leading Democrats and the liberal media were ALL saying (even up to inauguration day 2001) that there was irrefutable evidence Saddam Hussein still had WMD. Saddam’s actions alone in not allowing UNSCOM inspectors access to sensitive storage sites throughout Iraq only confirmed this mindset.
Also, the October 2002 Joint Congressional Resolution for the use of American force in Iraq makes it pretty plain the war wasn’t just about WMD … another liberal myth. Notice, too, when WMD are spoken of in the October 2002 JCR they are spoke of in the past tense. Something that braindead liberals have yet to understand about the latent threat posed by Saddam and his regime. And the Democrat leaders who tried to claim Bush had “cherrypicked” the intelligence, this too is an outright lie when one considers most of the Donks didn’t even reexamine the intelligence because they thought they already knew everything they needed to know to vote for the resolution.
This view is further corroborated by their comments during the previous Clinton Administration that in unambiguous terms accused Saddam of being a threat to his neighbors and the free world and that he was till hiding WMDs from UNSCOM inspectors.
Despite their subsequent pusillanimity, the Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee had the same access to raw intelligence that the President did. So the whole “cherrypicked” bilge is just another clever liberal lie that provides CYA for Democrats like Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Jay Rockefeller, et al.
BTW, despite Democrats’ claims to the contrary, when they signed that Joint Congressional Resolution, they indeed authorized President Bush to use American force in Iraq. Read the document:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This joint resolution may be cited as the `Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002′.
… SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to-
(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.
Once again clear documentary evidence proves liberal Democrats to be the liars, not President Bush.
16 onlineanalyst // Jan 21, 2009 at 4:34 pm
Keep your eye on Nancy Pelosi. She intends to tell Obama exactly how to execute his office, according to a recent Politico story.
The minister who gave the benediction during the inauguration offered up a prayer(?) that was so divisive that it probably set back racial harmony for many. With its ghetto-ese rhymes of bitterness, which I understand came from Malcolm X, the Rev. Lowery engendered laughter in the audience. The man is stuck in the grievances of the ’50’s and ’60’s, and offered a less-than-solemn ending to a significant occasion.
The “poet” offered drivel of no consequence.
I am a believer in the inherent liberties of the individual. As such, I will do all in my individual power to criticize and defeat the Obama-Pelosi-Reid axis to genuflect to the collective State.
In the words of Lowery, “Can I hear you say,’Amen’?”
Heh! My WV is “fools-beeline”. Was that descriptive of our favorite spoilers in the Scrappleface community?
17 gafisher // Jan 21, 2009 at 4:37 pm
RAM Re#14: Although the details are characteristically hard to pin down, it appears President Rice is still in Office. First, Obama is Constitutionally excluded from the Presidency unless and until he retakes the Oath of Office, the precise wording of which must be followed.
Second, that Oath, along with any Executive Orders or other “Official” acts he might attempt, cannot take effect until (and again unless) questions of his legitimacy as a natural born citizen are cleared up.
Moonbats notwithstanding, these two Constitutional requirements must be met before the Obama Presidency can be considered effective; until then, with the former President and Vice President gone, former Secretary of State Rice is legally our President.
18 upnorthlurkin // Jan 21, 2009 at 4:40 pm
Off to a roaring start….barkey, for the first time in 56 years, blew off The Salute to Heroes Inaugural Ball, started for President Eisenhower and attended by forty-eight MoH redipients. Ah well, who could blame this empty suit… probably be a real buzz-kill to be upstaged by a bunch of real heroes….
19 everthink // Jan 21, 2009 at 5:05 pm
Darth,
Would you be willing to offer testimony on behalf of the Dumbyah Administration?
I think they will need you soon. They can offer you as a expert on WMD, UCMJ, Constitutional Law, and so many other things.
It looks like your worst days are ahead of you.
(I tried to tell you!)
Your bestist pal,
ET
20 everthink // Jan 21, 2009 at 5:14 pm
“Are you ready for the libs new mantra that I heard a dozen times yesterday?
Here it is, “Obama is president now, so GET OVER IT!—
No, no! You folks sound speak your mind (such as it is)!
Who cares anyway?
ET
21 everthink // Jan 21, 2009 at 5:22 pm
Make that “should speak your mind”
ET
22 J. Cougar Melancholy // Jan 21, 2009 at 5:40 pm
Darth,
The Chief Justice gave the oath without notes and HE flubbed it! Obama graciously gave pause so he could correct himself. Regardless, it was a very human moment.
Stop drinking the Haterade!
23 gafisher // Jan 21, 2009 at 6:29 pm
JCM, you’re correct that Chief Justice Roberts slipped first, and that former Senator Obama paused in what to all appearances was a gracious manner. However, it is what the President-Elect says, not what the Chief Justice says, that matters, and unfortunately, for whatever reason, Obama did not recite the required Oath.
This has happened before — both Calvin Coolidge and Chester A. Arthur had to repeat the Oath later due to minor “flubs” during their inaugural ceremonies. But until that’s done, Obama is not the President.
24 everthink // Jan 21, 2009 at 6:44 pm
“But until that’s done, Obama is not the President.”
Wow! Maybe you should go tell him!
That use to happen all the time when military personnel were sworn in in groups. I knew a guy who claimed to have raised his left hand on purpose. The Army eventually sent him home, but not because of the oath, but because he was crazy enough to think it made a difference!
ET
25 gafisher // Jan 21, 2009 at 9:10 pm
AP NewsAlert
Jan 21 07:41 PM US/Eastern
WASHINGTON (AP) - Obama retakes oath of office, blundered first time …” [More here]
FLASH (DRUDGE): Obama was just re-sworn in. Roberts readministered the oath in the White House map room. Greg Craig there to oversee.
26 gafisher // Jan 21, 2009 at 9:17 pm
27 Darthmeister // Jan 21, 2009 at 11:48 pm
However you want to spin it, Cougar, but please start dealing with reality. It was Obama who first talked over Roberts giving the oath of office, that’s what set everything else in motion.
BTW, given how smart and experience The One is one wouldn’t think it would be that hard for Mr. Obama to simply repeat back what he’s hearing from the person administering a rather simple oath, right Cougie? But then Mr. Obama wasn’t using a teleprompter either. I find it amusing you hypocrites are already making excuses for your messiah because you know in your own heart of hearts that if George W. had flubbed the oath of office you would be calling Bush dumbya, retarded, stupid and an inarticulate chimp … something we’ve never said about Mr. Obama even in this instance. So stuff your self-righteous posturing, Couggie.
BTW, at my wedding the minister flubbed a line by rearranging a few words and I flawlessly repeated it back to him before the congregation. It can be done but I have to admit that in Mr. Obama’s case he was probably both nervous and without his teleprompter.
Obama retakes oath of office after flubbing it
I guess you think Obama should have “gotten over it” too and not bothered with retaking the oath, eh? Seems like he knew the importance of getting the oath right - something you trolls can’t appreciate because of your blind hatred toward us.
I merely made a correct observation that OBAMA FLUBBED the oath (whether Roberts did or not is irrelevant) and there was a real question whether the first oath was sufficient. Of course my humor about the situation probably went right over your pointy little heads, right Couggie?
At least Mr. Obama had the good graces to admit HIS mutual mistake in the matter and repeat the oath word-for-word. And given how this whole affair turned out good graces is obviously something that insufferable twits like you lack. When all was said and done regarding the flubbing of the oath of office, it looks like you’re the one swilling the Haterade, Couggie. I got it right, not you and those swilling the kool-aid on the left-wing blogs.
28 everthink // Jan 22, 2009 at 12:12 am
“The One is one wouldn’t think it would be that hard for Mr. Obama to simply repeat back what he’s hearing from the person administering a rather simple oath, right Cougie?”
What does this mean?
President Obama did repeat back what he was hearing, that was the problem! It was Justice Robert that misstated the oath.
You are getting worse, are taking your meds?
ET
29 Darthmeister // Jan 22, 2009 at 12:15 am
After reading neverthinks stupid post, I guess he must think Mr. Obama is crazy for having repeated the oath of office because “he actually thought it made a difference.” Well, apparently Mr. Obama did think it made a difference. I just wish Mr. Obama had also thought releasing a certified copy of his vault birth record to establish his credentials as a true “natural born citizen” was just as constitutionally important. And how many times did the liberals accuse President Bush merely on the basis of policy differences of “not following the Constitution”? Too many to count.
So what we Scrapplers can take away from this is apparently Republicans/conservatives must be subjected to what Democrats/liberals feel the Constitution might imply while they in turn can conveniently ignore what the Constitution explicitly says about “natural born citizens”, gun rights, limited federal powers, states’ rights, etc. Such is the cognitive dissonance among our feral population of whining trolls.
30 RepublicanAttackMachine // Jan 22, 2009 at 12:17 am
Countdown until Obama leaves Office
1459 Days, 14 Hours, 48 Minutes, 41 Seconds.
Then the biggest mistake in American history, will end the Dimocrats chances of EVER holding a majority in ANY branch of guv-mint again!
wv: employ Reid. It should be UNemploy Reid!
31 RepublicanAttackMachine // Jan 22, 2009 at 12:23 am
Pay no attention to everstink Darth, he thinks he is our “bestist” pal, whatever that means.
Only he, Obama, and Biden are “mistake free”.
It’s just a good thing he was not giving the oath.
32 Darthmeister // Jan 22, 2009 at 8:27 am
Inaugural Attendee: “You feel God is speaking to you.”
Whaaaaaat? Here we go again with Obamatons fawning over their new messiah. Read the other comments at news link.
Can you imagine the utter outrage and excoriation we would receive if conservatives gushed over ANY of their candidates in this manner? The thought that Mr. Obama is Joshua or Moses or even an Apostle is not only a fantastic leap in logic but politically ludicrous. This kind of stuff is dangerous and borders on cultic. This certainly doesn’t bode well for our republic.
33 Darthmeister // Jan 22, 2009 at 8:34 am
RAM, agreed. I saw an interview where Mr. Obama doesn’t duck his own nervous culpability in the matter and in fact was saying the good justice was trying to help him out. The fact that he retook the oath satisfies me and closes out this little kerfuffle. But with Biden and other liberals bashing Justice Roberts, that much is rather disgusting and partisan and demonstrates yet another chapter in their hateful derangement which apparently now hinges on their very defensive deification of Mr. Obama.
34 gafisher // Jan 22, 2009 at 10:32 am
Biden’s childish mocking of the Chief Justice is sadly degrading to the Office of Vice President; thankfully, at least the conservatives on the Court are above letting personal offense affect their deliberations on the pending Obama citizenship issue.
35 everthink // Jan 22, 2009 at 12:16 pm
“…degrading to the Office of Vice President;”
After Cheney! You must be kidding! What about Cheney’s comment to Senator Leahy?
Keep it up! Don’t let the last two elections dissuade you.
This site is getting to be more and more fun. It’s kinda like the Three Stooges in written form.
ET
36 everthink // Jan 22, 2009 at 12:22 pm
Darth,
Can you say President Obama?
ET
37 everthink // Jan 22, 2009 at 12:57 pm
RAM,
"Don’t go there fool, there are PLENTY MORE, and even more to come!"
Play 'em if you got 'em!
How dare you suggest that Dr. Graham would say such a vulgar thing! You know you can't use such words on this site. Are you saying Scott has allowed such things?
RAM, it's clear you are not quite as dumb as most of the others, do let the others lead you into unrighteousness.
But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to his brother, 'Raca,' is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says, 'You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell. Matthew 5:22 (NIV)
ET
38 upnorthlurkin // Jan 22, 2009 at 1:38 pm
Yeah, Darth…..slowly now….Duuuuummmmbbbboooo
(Just returning the favor….)
1458 days, 23 hours….or
Day 2.5 America held hostage…
39 everthink // Jan 22, 2009 at 2:57 pm
Yeah, like “let my people go!” Ah…,ah…, OK!!!
You’re free to leave.
Actually Lurch, I like your countdown clock. Watch what he does in the first hundred days, and you will see why.
Dumbyah is dumb, but nobody will ever believe that about PRESIDENT Obama.
ET
40 upnorthlurkin // Jan 22, 2009 at 3:03 pm
Uuuuhhhhh,aahh, ahhh, yeah, you’re right…..he just had to ask his general counsel what was in his executive order. So, is Greg Craig Oz(?! ) or is the puppetmaster Soros?!
41 upnorthlurkin // Jan 22, 2009 at 3:18 pm
Nevermind, I just got my answer….it is Greg Craig pulling the puppet strings…Barkey doesn’t even know what’s in his Executive Orders…..I guess his brain is just too full…..
42 RepublicanAttackMachine // Jan 22, 2009 at 3:28 pm
Obama not dumb?
“57 States”, “10,000 people killed in a storm-” the figure was closer to 10 TEN! Don’t go there fool, there are PLENTY MORE, and even more to come!
I love how everstink< (on the next thread), brings up about Dick Cheney cussing out Leahy, YET AGAIN.
I don’t see how “cussing” could agrivate someone who has said such filthy things here, some so disgusting they actually make Cheney’s cuss word seem like something Billy Graham might say in comparison.
Troll, -you really are a piece of work!
43 upnorthlurkin // Jan 22, 2009 at 4:13 pm
R.A.M. or, how about Dumbo flipping off Hillary….oh, that’s right…no, wait….wha??….And I just heard mr. always eloquent say, …”in a article 23 court…” Speaking of articles, could someone please ’splain to Barkey which article you’re supposed to use before a word starting with a vowel…(ex. an article, not a article…). This wuzzent da first time I heerd ‘im say it neither….
44 MajorDomo // Jan 22, 2009 at 4:19 pm
Yay RAM! Rice is Nice! Rice is Nice!Rice is Nice!
Rice is Nice!
Noticed today that Obummer’s “plan” to close Gitmo has fallen on the hard times of reality. In fact, it appears that he had no plan; that in fact he had no inkling of what he was doing! Had to ask Greg Craig what it all meant. (Wait… did we elect Craig, or did we elect Obama to have a plan and some knowledge?) Hence the heightening specter of Empty Suit continues to hover over him. Unnoticed, of course, by the deaf and blind society that trolls here.
Look for the continuation of the George Kingfish Stevens program to unfold before your very eyes.
45 upnorthlurkin // Jan 22, 2009 at 4:55 pm
Major, no disrespect intended, but I beat you to this with my #39 and 40…..just sayin’
Can you say in waaaaaay over his head?!
46 everthink // Jan 22, 2009 at 5:00 pm
Charge that to read: do not let the others lead you into unrighteousness.
ET
47 everthink // Jan 22, 2009 at 5:38 pm
MajorDomo,
“Look for the continuation of the George Kingfish Stevens program to unfold before your very eyes.”
Do you know why George Stevens was called “Kingfish”?
ET
‘
48 MajorDomo // Jan 22, 2009 at 5:42 pm
upnorth, my apologies! I’m gettin old (older than Fred) and I frequently disremember stuff I read 5 minutes ago.
49 everthink // Jan 22, 2009 at 6:13 pm
Yeah Major, be careful not to step on one of those jewels.
ET
50 RepublicanAttackMachine // Jan 23, 2009 at 11:29 am
everstink, Way to take GOD’s Word out of context, and besides, don’t you KNOW the the King James version is the UNCHANGED Bible, or at least the PUREST version we have?
Probably not, GOD also said, “They are blind and cannot see!”
Here is King James Version:
Matthew 5:21-22 (King James Version)
21Ye have heard that it was said of them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:
22But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.
Key words? “without a cause”! YOU, troll, have given EVERYONE cause, and that is what you TRY to do.
GOD calls people like you “fools” also.
Is HE too in danger of hell fire? Please tell us. Satan ALSO thinks he knows GOD’s will.
You blind “FOOL”!
51 everthink // Jan 23, 2009 at 12:15 pm
RAM,
But I say unto you, That whosoever is ANGRY with his brother WITHOUT A CAUSE shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but WHOSOEVER shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire. Matthew 5:22 (KJV)
Do you some kind of “Republican Loophole Commentary”, or what?
ET
52 everthink // Jan 23, 2009 at 12:17 pm
HAVE
You must log in to post a comment.